BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Nov 28, 2026; 12(4): 127250
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.127250
Table 1 Regulation of fibroblast growth factor 23 production and processing by iron status, inflammation, and erythropoietic signals
Stimulus
Effect on production
Effect on processing
Biological consequence
Iron deficiencyStimulates FGF23 transcription through iron- and HIF-sensitive pathwaysIncreased cleavage usually limits iFGF23 accumulationPredominant rise in the C-terminal signal with preserved phosphate homeostasis. Experimental and human evidence[8,9]
Iron deficiency with impaired cleavage (e.g., ADHR)Stimulates FGF23 productionCleavage-resistant FGF23 accumulatesIncreased iFGF23, renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemia. Genetic and experimental evidence[8]
InflammationCytokines directly stimulate FGF23 transcription and also restrict iron availability through hepcidinProcessing may increase in parallel, especially early in inflammationThe iFGF23 response depends on the balance between production and cleavage. Experimental evidence[10]
Blood loss and erythropoietic stressEPO and marrow erythroid cells increase FGF23 productionCleavage commonly increasesLinks the response to anemia with FGF23 regulation. Mouse and human EPO studies[13,14]
Iron repletionRemoves the iron-deficiency stimulusCleavage rate is not directly quantified by the fall in cFGF23Restores iron-dependent regulation. Human intervention evidence[9]
Some intravenous iron formulationsCorrect iron deficiency but may transiently alter post-translational regulationIntact hormone rises after some formulations; the molecular mechanism remains unresolvedTransient iFGF23 elevation, phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemia. Randomized human evidence[16,17]


Write to the Help Desk