BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Nov 28, 2026; 12(4): 124866
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.124866
Table 1 Potential peptide-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease with current clinical data
Peptide
Class/mechanism
Route
IBD population
Highest evidence
Study design /n/comparator
Duration
Principal result
Evidence maturity/source
Anti-inflammatory peptides
Icotrokinra[48,49]Selective IL-23 receptor antagonist; inhibits IL-23 mediated inflammatory signalingOralModerate-to-severe UCPhase 2b human interventional studyPhase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose ranging RCT (n = 252). 100 mg, 200 mg or 400 mg daily vs placebo Primary assessment 12 weeks. Exploratory follow up to week 28All doses met week-12 endpoint (clinical response vs placebo). Clinical, endoscopic and biomarker responses persisted through exploratory week-28 analysesLevel 1: Human interventional. Conference abstract/trial reporting
K(D)PT[50-52]Tripeptide derivative of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; anti-inflammatory and epithelial barrier-supportive effectsOralMild-to-moderate UCPhase 2a human interventional studyMulticentre phase 2a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 162). 20 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily vs placebo as add-on therapy12 weeksPooled K(D)PT improved remission at weeks 2 and 4 and CAI response at week 8. Remission later converged with placebo because of a high placebo responseLevel 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed
CGMP[53-55]Bovine milk-derived glycopeptide; proposed anti-inflammatory, microbiome modifying and barrier-supportive effectsOralActive distal UCPilot human interventional studyRandomized open-label pilot study (n = 24). CGMP vs mesalamine escalation4 weeks comparative treatment; follow-up to 8 weeksAt week 4, there were no significant between-group differences in SCCAI improvement or stability, with broadly similar changes in endoscopic disease extent and severityLevel 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed
Barrier protective and mucosal healing peptides
GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide)[96,99,100]GLP-1 receptor agonist; proposed anti-inflammatory and intestinal barrier-supportive effects, alongside established metabolic actionsSubcutaneousUC and CD. Predominantly concomitant T2DM and/or obesityHuman observational evidenceMultiple retrospective studies. Largest cohort (n = 3737). Exposed vs non-exposed with adjustmentLongitudinal follow-up; study dependentGLP-1 agonist exposure was associated with lower composite risk of hospitalisation, surgery, steroid dependence, treatment escalation, mortalityLevel 3: Human observational. Peer reviewed observational studies/systematic review
Teduglutide[108-110]GLP-2 analogue; promotion of intestinal epithelial growth, repair and barrier integritySubcutaneousModerate-to-severe CDPhase 2 human interventional studyPilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging (n = 100). Teduglutide vs placebo8 weeks placebo-controlled treatment; optional 12-week extensionGreater clinical remission and response compared to placebo; differences were not statistically significantLevel 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed
EGF[111-113]Growth-factor peptide; promotes epithelial restitution, proliferation and mucosal healingTopical enemaMild-to-moderate left sided UC or proctitisHuman interventional RCTRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 24). EGF vs placebo in conjunction with oral mesalamine14 days treatment; follow-up to 12 weeksWeek-2 remission was more frequent with EGF than placebo; clinical, endoscopic and histologic outcomes also favoured EGF, with initial response maintained through 12 weeksLevel 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed
TFF3[111,112,114]Intestinal repair peptide; promotes epithelial restitution, mucus integrity and mucosal barrier repairTopical enemaMild-moderate left-sided UCHuman interventional RCTRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 16). TFF3 vs saline placebo in conjunction with oral mesalamine14 days treatment; follow-up to 12 weeksNo treatment benefit over placebo notedLevel 1: Human interventional. Peer reviewed


Write to the Help Desk