Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Jul 28, 2026; 12(2): 120845
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.120845
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.120845
Table 5 Contraceptive options in women with cirrhosis and portal hypertension
| Method | WHO MEC category (compensated liver disease) | WHO MEC category (decompensated cirrhosis/portal hypertension with varices) | Key recommendations |
| Barrier method | 1 | 1 | Less effective alone; encourage for dual protection |
| Combined oral contraceptives | 3 | 4 | Avoid due to estrogenic effects; may worsen cholestasis and increase thrombosis risk |
| Injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate | 2 | 3 | Effective, but caution due to risk of bone loss; osteoporosis is common in cirrhosis |
| Progestin implant/LNG-IUS | 1 | 2 | Highly effective; preferred long-acting reversible options |
| Copper IUCD | 1 | 2-3 (if severe anemia) | Acceptable if anemia is controlled; monitor for bleeding |
| Female sterilization | 1 (if medically fit) | 2-3 | Surgical risk increased by collaterals and coagulopathy; laparotomy may be safer than laparoscopy |
- Citation: Rajput M, Kumar A. Esophageal varices in pregnancy: Strategies to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(2): 120845
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6132/full/v12/i2/120845.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5528/wjtm.120845