Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation

Abstract

Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.

Key Words: Review, Immunosuppression, Investigational agents, Renal/kidney transplant

Core tip: Many new agents are being studied that may improve outcomes after renal transplantation. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a recently Food and Drug Administration approved, prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab.

INTRODUCTION

Although significant advances in renal transplant immunosuppression have occurred in the past decades, a vital need to improve long-term survival remains. Currently, immunologic causes of early graft failure have become rare, yet late graft loss has remained virtually unchanged. One of the most common causes for graft loss is chronic allograft nephropathy. Additionally, significant drug improvements in transplantation have come with the expense of side effects. Many of these adverse events, including new onset diabetes after transplant, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, may contribute to cardiovascular related deaths after transplantation. The ideal immunosuppressive regimen would improve long-term outcomes while minimizing exposure to drug toxicity and infection.

Induction agents are typically antibodies (anti-thymocyte globulins) or interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (basiliximab). Another induction agent, alemtuzumab has been removed from the United States market, but is still available through a special manufacturer program. The five drug classes that currently comprise maintenance regimens may include calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus), mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus), antiproliferative agents (azathioprine and mycophenolic acid), costimulation blockers (belatacept) and corticosteroids (Table 1). KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines suggest that first-line agents should include basiliximab induction for low-risk patients and an anti-thymocyte globulin for high-risk patients in conjunction with maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus and mycophenolate[1]. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog (Table 2). A novel, anti CD-40 molecule has completed phase 1 studies.

Table 1 Summary of investigational and available agents.

Generic	Brand	FDA indication	Company
Alefacept12	Amevive	Treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy	Astellas
Alemtuzumab2	Campath	Treatment of B-CLL	Berlex Laboratories
ASKP1240		Not FDA approved	Astellas
Azathioprine	Imuran	Adjunctive therapy in prevention of rejection of kidney transplants; management of active rheumatoid arthritis	Generic manufacturers
Basiliximab	Simulect	Prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplantation	Novartis
Belatacept	Nulojix	Prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients	Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Bortezomib	Velcade	Treatment of multiple myeloma; treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma	Millenium Pharmaceuticals
Cyclosporine	Neoral	Prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients	Novartis
Eculizumab	Soliris	Treatment of PNH to reduce hemolysis and aHUS	Alexion Pharmaceuticals
Efalizumab12	Raptiva	Management of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adults	Genentech
Everolimus	Afinitor, Zortress	Treatment of advanced renal cell cancer (Afinitor®); treatment of subependymal giant cell astrocytom associated with tuberous sclerosis (Afinitor®); treatment of advanced, metastatic or unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Afinitor®); prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients at low-moderate immunologic risk receiving renal transplants (Zortress®)	Novartis
Mycophenolate Mofetil	Cellcept	Prophylaxis of organ rejection concomitantly with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in patients receiving allogeneic renal cardiac, or hepatic transplants	Genentech
Mycophenolate Sodium	Myfortic	Prophylaxis of organ rejection concomitantly with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in patients receiving allogeneic renal transplantation	Novartis
Horse or Rabbit anti-thymocyte Globulin	Atgam or Thymoglobulin	Treatment of corticosteroid resistant rejection in kidney transplantation	Pfizer/Sanofi
Rituximab	Rituxan	Treatment of CD20-positive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas ; Treatment of moderately- to severely-active rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients with inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonists; Treatment of Wegener’s granulomatosis; Treatment of microscopic polyangiitis	Genentech
Sirolimus	Rapamune	Prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients	Pfizer
Sotrastaurin, AEB-0711		Not FDA approved	Novartis
Tacrolimus	Prograf	Prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients	Astellas
Tacrolimus Prolonged Release	Astragraf XL	Preventing organ rejection in kidney transplant recipients, as combination therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids, with or without tasiliximab induction	Astellas
Tolfacitinib1	Xeljanz	Treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis	Pfizer
Voclosporin		Not FDA approved	Isotechnika Pharma

¹No longer being investigated for transplantation;

²Withdrawn from United States Market. FDA: Food and Drug Administration; B-CLL: B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia; PNH: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; aHUS: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Table 2 Non-Food and Drug Administration approved/investigational agents and their mechanism.

Drug name	Mechanism of action
Induction
Efalizumab1	Humanized antibody, CD11a/LFA-1
Alefacept1	Costimulation inhibitor, CD2 LFA3
Maintenance
Voclosporin, ISA247	Calcineurin inhibitor
Sotrastaurin, AEB0711	Protein kinase C inhibitor
Tofacitinib, CP-6905501	JAK 3 inhibitor
ASKP1240	Anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody
Treatment of Antibody Medicated Rejection
Bortezomib	Proteasome inhibitor
Eculizumab	Monoclonal antibody, C5 complement protein

¹No longer being investigated for transplantation.

Another area for improvement is treatment of humoral rejection. Historically, treatment has been difficult and not well studied. Humoral rejection is typically treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab and plasmapheresis. Investigational treatments for antibody mediated rejection that will be discussed include bortezomib and eculizumab.

In the past years, several clinical trials have been unsuccessful and therefore many agents are no longer being pursued for transplantation. These agents include two inductions agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and two maintenance agents, sotrastaurin (a protein kinase C inhibitor) and tofacitinib (a JAK 3 inhibitor). This review article will update a previously published article found in this journal[2] on the effectiveness and safety of novel immunosuppressive agents.

PREVENTATIVE AGENTS

Alternatives to currently available calcineurin inhibitors

Calcineurin inhibitors have revolutionized post-transplantation immunosuppressive regimens by significantly lowering acute rejections rates. Yet, long-term use of these drugs has been associated with the development of chronic allograft nephropathy and adverse events. New immunosuppressive agents that eliminate these issues are needed. Prolonged release tacrolimus (Astragraf XL^®, Astellas) has been approved for use in various European countries, Canada and the United States (in July 2013). The expectation is that the products once daily, rather than twice daily, dosing will improve adherence in transplant recipients. Large, randomized, phase 3 studies have compared prolonged release-tacrolimus compared to tacrolimus with similar efficacy and safety outcomes[3,4]. Of note, tacrolimus levels may be slightly lower with prolonged release tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus patients[5-7], although serum creatinine, creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate were very similar. Prolonged release tacrolimus has a non-inferior efficacy profile with convenient daily dosing which is expected to improve patient compliance. Drug cost may influence the widespread use of this product as generic tacrolimus formulations are now available.

A novel calcineurin inhibitor, voclosporin (ISA 247, Isotechnika Pharma, Inc.) is being investigated in solid organ transplant, uveitis, and psoriasis[8-11]. Animal studies demonstrated that voclosporin, a cyclosporine analogue, had a higher affinity and greater in-vivo potency[12,13]. PROMISE, a phase 2b trial of low risk renal transplant recipients with immediate allograft function (n = 334) compared low (0.4 mg/kg), medium (0.6 mg/kg) and high (0.8 mg/kg) dose voclosporin to tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg), in combination with a standard immunosuppressive regimen (anti-CD25 antibody, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids). Rejection rates were non-inferior to tacrolimus (11%, 9%, 2 %, and 6% respectively) and renal function was clinically similar (69-72 mL/min) at 6 mo after transplantation[8]. The incidence of new onset diabetes after transplantation was significantly lower in the low dose voclosporin group (1.6% vs 16.4% tacrolimus), but not in the medium (5.7%) and high dose (17.7%) arms[8]. The major limitation of this trial was that only low risk patients were studied. Low to medium dose voclosporin may provide adequate immunosuppression with a lower incidence of new onset diabetes after transplantation. A large, phase 3 (n = 598) trial is planned for 2013.

Recently, pharmacokinetic data of voclosporin was presented at the American Transplant Congress[14-17]. Researchers have learned that voclosporin should be given on an empty stomach and that dosage adjustment may be needed in severe renal failure (< 30 mL/min) and mild to moderate hepatic impairment[14-16]. Optimal trough concentrations should be targeted between 35-60 ng/mL[17].

Belatacept (Nulojix^®, Bristol Myers Squibb) is a second generation co-stimulation blocker (CD80 antagonism) that received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in kidney transplantation in June of 2011. Belatacept is contraindicated in patients that are Ebstein-Barr virus seronegative, because of high incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative seen in clinical trials[19-22]. Belatacept is administered as a well-tolerated intravenous infusion over 30 min. The recommended dosing is 10 mg/kg administered, prior to transplantation, on day 5, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 wk (plus or minus 3 d). The chronic intravenous administration could prove beneficial in increasing patient compliance with less frequent (monthly) infusions. In contrast, it may be perceived as a barrier to patients without social support that cannot readily access an infusion center. Administration and drug costs may also influence prescribing patterns and patient compliance.

Belatacept is the first immunosuppressive to demonstrate a renal benefit over a calcineurin inhibitor based regimen[18-22]. One limitation of the early belatacept trials (BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT) was that cyclosporine, a less contemporary immunosuppressive, was utilized[19-22]. In a phase 2, 1 year randomized study, belatacept/mycophenolate mofetil, belatacept/sirolimus and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil, in combination with rabbit antithymocyte globulin and without corticosteroids were compared (n = 89)[23]. Acute rejection was highest in the belatacept/mycophenolate mofetil arm, graft loss was lowest in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate arm, and renal function was improved in the belatacept arms.

As an alternative to de novo immunosuppression, a conversion trial recently tested the hypothesis that belatacept-based regimens may provide a treatment option in patients already being treated with calcineurin-based maintenance immunosuppression[24]. Patients with stable graft function (calculated glomerular filtration rate between 35-75 mL/min) were randomized to either switch to belatacept (n =84) or continue calcineurin inhibitor treatment (n = 89). Despite a higher acute rejection rate in the belatacept group, the relative renal benefit of belatacept was observed in patients switched from either cyclosporine (+7.8 mL/min) or tacrolimus (+8.9 mL/min), and was observed regardless of baseline renal function. Patient survival, graft survival and the overall safety profile was similar between groups.

The impact of belatacept on long-term cardiovascular profiles is yet to be determined. An analysis of the pooled data from the BENEFIT AND BENEFIT-EXT trials showed lower blood pressures, lower non HDL cholesterol, lower triglycerides and less new onset diabetes mellitus after transplanation in the belatacept-treated patients versus the cyclosporine treated patients[25]. Yet, in a post-hoc analysis in patients with pre-existing diabetes from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, 12 mo patient survival, graft survival, and renal function were similar between belatacept and cyclosporine treated patients[26]. Further trials are needed to explore the long-term outcomes, the impact of Epstein-Barr virus on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and chronic allograft nephropathy. These trials should include contemporary immunosuppressive regimens.

A fully human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240 (Astellas^®), has shown promise in phase 1 studies[27-29]. The first human, phase 1 study of healthy subjects (n = 12) demonstrated that the antibody was safe and well-tolerated[28]. Subsequently, a phase 1b trial, was performed in de novo kidney transplant recipients that received a single intravenous dose of 50 mg (n = 10), 100 mg (n = 9), 200 mg (n = 10), 500 mg (n = 9) or placebo (n = 8), no induction and standard maintenance immunosuppression per each center’s protocol[26]. ASKP1240 exhibited non-linear pharmacokinetics and was well tolerated at all doses. Acute rejection occurred in 3 patients in the 50 mg arm, 3 patients in the 500 mg arm and 1 patient in the placebo arm. The incidence of infection was not dose dependent. A phase 2 trial will compare the efficacy of ASKP1240 with calcineurin avoidance (basiliximab induction, ASKP1240, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids) to the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab induction + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + steroids). In addition, the study will compare the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitor minimization-mycophenolate mofetil avoidance (basiliximab induction, ASKP1240, tacrolimus and steroids) to the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen.

TREATMENT OF ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION

Antibody mediated rejection is an important cause of acute and chronic graft failure. Acute and chronic antibody mediated rejections are difficult to treat, because they are typically less responsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy. Treatment regimens for acute antibody mediated rejection may include one or more of the following: plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab[30-38], although these regimens are not well-studied. A recent meta-analysis of over 10000 citations on treatment of antibody-mediated rejection concluded that data describing these treatments are of low or very low quality[34]. The first, prospective, randomized study comparing these strategies (plasmapheresis/IVIG/rituximab vs IVIG alone) demonstrated improved graft survival in the combination group[38]. Little guidance is given by the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines, they suggest treating antibody-mediated acute rejection with one or more of the following alternatives with or without corticosteroids: plasma exchange; intravenous immunoglobulin; anti-CD20 antibody; lymphocyte-depleting antibody (Grade 2C Recommendation)[1]. Two investigational treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab.

Bortezomib (Velcade^®, Millenium Pharmaceuticals) has been used for treatment of acute antibody mediated rejection, although it is approved for multiple myeloma in the United States (2010). It inhibits the degradation of cell-cycle regulatory proteins resulting in cell-cycle death via apoptosis. Bortezomib is metabolized via the cytochrome P450 system, a major substrate of 2C19 and 3A4 and inhibitor of 2C19, and therefore several drug interactions may occur including ketoconazole, clopidogrel, and grapefruit juice. Adverse events associated with bortezomib may include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation (up to 50%), peripheral neuropathy (up to 30%), hypotension, QT prolongation, heart failure, pneumonitis and pneumonia. One case series of 52 transplant patients treated for antibody mediated rejection or desensitization reported bortezomib associated toxicity to be low, most commonly reported as manageable anemia or peripheral neuropathy[39]. Dosing of bortezomib is 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11. No adjustments are necessary for renal impairment, but the dosage should be reduced by one-half for moderate to severe hepatic impairment.

Case series have reported the use of bortezomib to remove HLA antibodies in live-donor transplant recipients with HLA alloantibodies[40,41] and to treat antibody and cell-mediated acute rejection[42-51]. Few comparative trials have been performed. One German, historical control study of 10 bortezomib-treated patients (4 doses of 1.3 mg/m²) vs 9 rituximab-treated patients (one fixed dose of 500 mg) with antibody mediated rejection showed improved survival in the bortezomib treated group with an 18 mo graft survival of 60% vs 11% in the rituximab group[52]. All patients received plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin (30 g). Randomized trials are needed to determine the influence of bortezomib on antibody removal.

Eculizumab (Soliris^®, Alexion Pharmaceuticals) is a humanized monoclonal IgG antibody that binds to complement protein C5 and blocks the activation of terminal complement. It is FDA approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. The most common side effects are headache, nausea, fatigue, back pain, cough and nasopharyngitis. Fatal immune hemolytic anemia following allogeneic stem cell transplantation has been reported[53]. Vaccination with meningococcal vaccine at least 2 wk prior to initiation of treatment with continued long-term prophylaxis is recommended. Eculizumab should not be used in patients with serious infections.

Case studies in renal transplant recipients have reported successful treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic microangiopathy with eculizumab[54-66]. Eculizumab has also been successful in reducing antibodies in a highly sensitized patient with positive crossmatches prior to live donor transplant[67] and in prevention of antibody mediated rejection in a case series of patients with donor specific antibodies and positive flow cytometry cross-matches (n = 4)[68]. In a larger case-control study, patients with donor specific antibodies who received pre-transplant plasmapheresis and post-transplant eculizumab were compared to historical controls[69]. At a median follow up of 12 mo for the eculizumab group, antibody mediated rejection occurred in 7.7 % (2/26) in the eculizumab group compared to 41% (21/51) in the control group (P < 0.01). One-year protocol biopsy revealed transplant glomerulopathy in 6.7% (1/15) eculizumab-treated recipients and in 35.7% (15/42) of control patients (P = 0.044). Eculizumab use has also been described in an ABO-incompatible deceased-donor kidney and pancreas transplant with a severe antibody-mediated rejection[70,71].

Eculizumab 600 mg weekly for six doses with plasmapheresis has also been successful in reversing refractory, early (mean time 6.5 d), acute antibody mediated rejection in four transplant recipients[72]. Mean follow up time is 6.4 ± 5.7 mo, and while antibodies persisted in the majority of the patients, the allografts are functioning and infectious complications have not occurred. Successful use of eculizumab has also been reported in two patients with antibody mediated rejection associated with thrombotic microangiopathy[73] and three patients with resistant antibody mediated rejection[74,75].

Despite the small sample size and lack of randomized controls, these studies are encouraging, and although larger studies and long-term follow-up are needed, bortezomib and eculizumab may play a major role in acute antibody mediated therapy in the future. Their role in transplant desensitization may be better elucidated as more clinical data and well-designed clinical trials become available. Current and future trials of bortezomib and eculizumab are listed in Table 3[76].

Table 3 Clinical trials.

Agent	Identifier	Study name	Start date
ASKP1240	NCT01780844	A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ASKP1240 in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients	February 2013
Voclosporin	NCT01586845	Safety and Efficacy Study of Voclosporin and Tacrolimus in Transplantation	March 2013
Prolonged Release Tacrolimus	NCT01294020	Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Pediatric Allograft Recipients Converted From Prograf® to Advagraf®	May 2011
Bortezomib	NCT01873157	Bortezomib in Late Antibody-mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection (BORTEJECT)	October 2013
	NCT01349595	Impact of Proteasome Inhibition on Anti-Donor HLA Antibody Production After Kidney Transplantation	December 2011
	NCT01842074	Desensitization With Bortezomib Before a Living Kidney Donation (VELDON)	January 2013
	NCT01502267	Desensitization Protocol for Highly Sensitized Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplant	January 2010
	NCT00722722	The Impact of Velcade on Antibody Secreting Cells in Sensitized Renal Allograft Candidates	June 2008
Eculizumab	NCT01349595	Impact of Proteasome Inhibition on Anti-Donor HLA Antibody Production After Kidney Transplantation	December 2011
	NCT01327573	Eculizumab Therapy for Chronic Complement-Mediated Injury in Kidney Transplantation	March 2011
	NCT01095887	Eculizumab Added to Conventional Treatment in the Prevention of Antibody-mediated Rejection in ABO Blood Group Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (ABOi)	March 2010
	NCT01403389	A Study of the Activity of Eculizumab for Prevention of Delayed Graft Function In Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant	August 2011
	NCT01567085	Safety and Efficacy Of Eculizumab In The Prevention Of Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) In Sensitized Recipients Of A Kidney Transplant From A Deceased Donor	May 2012
	NCT01106027	Dosing Regimen of Eculizumab Added to Conventional Treatment in Positive Crossmatch Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant	March 2010
	NCT01399593	Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab to Prevent AMR in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Requiring Desensitization	September 2011

AGENTS NO LONGER BEING INVESTIGATED

Efalizumab (Raptiva^®, Genentech) works an immunosuppressant by binding to the CD11a subunit of lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) and inhibiting white blood cell migration. This once weekly intramuscular injection was indicated for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, but has been associated with an increased risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and was withdrawn from the market in April of 2009[77]. Likewise, clinical trials in renal transplant recipients have not been successful due to higher rates of lymphoproliferative disease[78].

Alefacept (Amevive^®, Astellas Pharmaceuticals) is a CD2-LFA3 co-stimulation inhibitor[79,80], was an intramuscular injection indicated for treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plague psoriasis. Alefacept was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by Astellas Pharmaceuticals in December of 2011 due to “business needs”[81]. Prior to the discontinuation, alefacept was being developed for use in conjunction with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in renal transplantation. In a phase 2, de novo study of adult kidney transplant patients alefacept (vs placebo) resulted in similar survival and rejection rates, however the incidence of malignancy was higher in the alefacept arm[82].

Sotrastaurin (AEB071, Novartis), a protein kinase inhibitor, initially proved to have a good tolerability profile with few adverse effects[83]. Sotrastaurin development has been halted due high rejection rates (up to 40%) in de novo transplant recipients despite promising results with renal function and a low toxicity profile[83-87].

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz^®, Tofacitinib CP-690550, Pfizer Inc.), is a kinase inhibitor with immunosuppressant properties that was FDA approved for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in November of 2012. Tofacitinib is a small molecule agent which exhibits selective inhibition for the JAKs, thus inactivating the JAK/STAT dependent IL-2 induced T-cell proliferation.

Tofacitinib was being studied as a drug to be used in place of calcineurin inhibitors along with other anti-metabolite agents in two phase 2 clinical trials. In a small, initial, clinical study on de novo kidney allograft recipients comparing a tofacitinib regimen at 15 mg twice daily (CP15) and 30 mg twice daily (CP30) with tacrolimus, researchers reported the 6-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates to be 1 of 20, 4 of 20 and 1 of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups respectively and concluded the 15 mg bid regimen to be similar to the tacrolimus regimen[88]. All patients received interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids. In a subsequent, larger phase-2 trial (n = 331), a standard cyclosporine regimen was compared with a 15 mg twice daily regimen of tofacitinib which is subsequently switched to 10 mg twice daily after 3 mo (less-intensive) and another 15 mg twice daily regimen of tofacitinib which is switched to 10 mg twice daily after 6 mo (more-intensive)[89]. The biopsy proven acute rejection at 6 mo with the low-dose group (11%) was lower than the more-intensity or cyclosporine groups (7% and 9%, respectively). In terms of glomerular filtration rate at 12 mo, the tofacitinib groups (less-intensity: 65 mL/min and more-intensity: 65 mL/min) showed a significant difference in preservation of renal function compared to the cyclosporine group (54 mL/min). In this study, there was a lower incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy in the more intense and less intense groups (25% and 24% respectively) compared to the cyclosporine group (48%).

The smaller clinical study reported a high incidence of BK virus in the CP30 group (4/20) and a higher 6 mo rate of CMV disease (4/20) compared to CP15 and tacrolimus (2/20 and 0/20 respectively)[88]. Some other common abnormalities noted with this agent were trends towards higher lipid elevations, anemia and neutropenia during the first 6 mo of the treatment when the mycophenolate mofetil dose was high. In the larger, phase 2 trial, there were fewer cases of new-onset diabetes in the more-intense and less-intense groups (9.9% and 9.3% respectively) compared to cyclosporine (20.8%)[89]. The rate of serious infections, BK virus nephritis, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and CMV disease was higher in the tofacitinib groups. The overall findings of the phase 2 studies suggest that tofacitinib is effective in preventing acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy, although this was achieved at the expense of hematological toxicity and over-immunosuppression when used in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. Although research has shown that safety may be improved by concentration-controlled dosing[90], tofacitinib development has been discontinued.

CONCLUSION

Induction agents are typically antibodies (anti-thymocyte globulins) or interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (basiliximab). Alemtuzumab has been removed from the United States market, but is available through the manufacturer through a special program. Many questions remain surrounding the use of potent induction agents including whether or not the use is associated with infection and malignancy, if the use is cost-effective, and if there is a true graft survival benefit. Due to poor clinical outcomes, induction investigational agents including, efalizumab and alefacept, are no longer being studied. Maintenance immunosuppressives may show some promise with future novel agents. Prolonged release tacrolimus provides once daily dosing of this product and hopefully will simplify a complex post-transplant immunosuppressive regimen. It is unknown if the perceived benefits will outweigh the cost of this product. Voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog, has not shown superior efficacy outcomes, but perhaps improvement in the safety profile (namely new-onset diabetes after transplant) will secure its place in transplant immunotherapy as the phase 3 trials are underway. ASKP, an anti-CD40 antibody, has successfully completed phase 1 studies and phase 2 trials are ongoing. Although belatacept has shown promise, two other investigational maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tolfacitinib, will not be studied further in transplantation.

Treatment regimens for acute humoral rejection may include one or more of the following: plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. Investigations of bortezomib and eculizumab have been hindered by small, non-randomized trials. Although results are encouraging, larger studies and long-term follow-up is ongoing.

At this point in time, there are very few immunosuppressants in clinical trials. Although some investigational agents have shown promise, tailoring available agents may need to be the short-term focus for transplant recipients. Hopefully, modifying exist regimens and approval of investigational agents will satisfy the ultimate goal of transplantation to improve long-term survival without toxicity or infection.