Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Psychiatr. Mar 22, 2016; 6(1): 177-186
Published online Mar 22, 2016. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.177
Table 4 Quality assessment of the retrieved studies
Ref.Q1Q2Q3Q5Q6Q15Q18Q25
Hypothesis clearly describedMain outcomes clearly described in the introduction or methods sectionParticipants characteristics clearly describedDistributions of confounders in each group of subjects clearly describedMain study findings clearly describedStudy measurement blindAppropriateness of the statistical testsAdjustment for confounding
Kazlouski et al[13]YesYesYesNoYesUUNo
Frank et al[49]YesYesYesPartiallyYesUYesYes
Nagahara et al[7]YesYesYesNoYesUYesNo
Via et al[53]YesYesYesYesYesUYesYes
Frieling et al[5]YesYesYesYesYesUYesYes
Yau et al[39]YesYesYesNoYesUYesNo