Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 124253
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124253
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124253
Table 5 Quality of life scores, mean ± SD
| Group | Control group (n = 60) | Observation group (n = 60) | t | P value |
| Somatic functions | ||||
| Per-care | 54.43 ± 5.75 | 54.83 ± 5.14 | 0.402 | 0.689 |
| Post-care | 68.02 ± 6.66a | 71.60 ± 4.28a | 3.507 | 0.001 |
| Psychological function | ||||
| Per-care | 50.75 ± 5.11 | 51.07 ± 5.76 | 0.319 | 0.751 |
| Post-care | 72.87 ± 6.42a | 75.63 ± 5.38a | 2.557 | 0.012 |
| Social function | ||||
| Per-care | 63.95 ± 4.21 | 63.85 ± 4.21 | 0.130 | 0.897 |
| Post-care | 68.43 ± 4.24a | 73.43 ± 4.44a | 6.303 | < 0.001 |
| Material life | ||||
| Per-care | 63.00 ± 4.03 | 62.75 ± 3.80 | 0.350 | 0.727 |
| Post-care | 70.35 ± 3.05a | 71.78 ± 4.35a | 2.088 | 0.039 |
- Citation: Zhang ZJ, Ma LL, Xu YB, Zhang J, Huang WQ, Bian Z, Zhang XY, Song Q. Structured psychological intervention based on Omaha system model for postoperative maxillofacial tumor patients. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124253
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/124253.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.124253