Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 108525
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.108525
Table 4 Summary of the significance of various tests for both clozapine-induced myocarditis and clozapine-induced pneumonia
Test
CIM sensitivity/specificity
CIP sensitivity/specificity
Dynamic monitoring
Comments
EKG changesNon-specific and seen in 78% of patients[21]Non-specific[40]NAFeasible in all settings
Non-specific changes (e.g., ST changes, T-wave inversion) in CIM; normal in 22% of cases
Limited use in CIP
cTnl34%/89%Elevated by 52%[43]Cornerstone for CIM screening; elevated in CIPFeasible in all settings
Repeating testing is critical for trends (> 20% rise suggests escalation)
CRP52%/81%[22]Elevated in 75%[44]Yes (24-48 hours) in CIM
Repeat testing (e.g., > 50 mg/L) informs interim management
Feasible in all settings
Echo changesNonspecific and seen in 30-60%[23]Likely normalYes (48 hours-5 days)Feasible in most settings
Detects wall motion defects in CIM, normal in CIP. Serial testing is key in resource-limited settings (echo-only pathway)
Chest X-rayNA51% sensitivityNAFeasible in most settings
Misses CIP in approximately 50% of cases; used in resource-limited settings. Normal X-ray requires clinical correlation
Chest CTNA90.7%NAGold standard for CIP; critical for excluding CIP in CIM workup
Limited to well-resourced settings due to cost (300 dollars-1000 dollars)
Endomyocardial biopsy60%/80%[28]NANAGold standard for CIM; invasive, rarely used. Feasible only in specialized centers with severe cases
Cardiac MRI88%/91%[32]NANANon-invasive, highly sensitive for CIM
Limited by cost (1000 dollars-3000 dollars) and access (2-4-week wait)
Preferred in well-resourced settings