Validity, reliability, and psychometric properties of a computerized, cognitive assessment test (Cognivue®)

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 1

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Psychiatry

ISSN

2220-3206

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Psychiatr. Jan 19, 2020; 10(1): 1-11
Published online Jan 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i1.1

Table 3 Summary of Cognivue^® cut-off score analysis

	SLUMS cut-off scores		Cognivue^® cut-off scores
Impaired	< 21	→	≤ 50
Mildly impaired (intermediate)	21-26	→	51-74
Unimpaired	> 26	→	≥ 75

SLUMS: St. Louis University Mental Status.

Citation: Cahn-Hidalgo D, Estes PW, Benabou R. Validity, reliability, and psychometric properties of a computerized, cognitive assessment test (Cognivue^®). World J Psychiatr 2020; 10(1): 1-11
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v10/i1/1.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i1.1

Cahn-Hidalgo D, Estes PW, Benabou R. Validity, reliability, and psychometric properties of a computerized, cognitive assessment test (Cognivue^®). World J Psychiatr 2020; 10(1): 1-11 [PMID: 31956523 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i1.1]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.