Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Crit Care Med. Dec 20, 2019; 8(8): 135-147
Published online Dec 20, 2019. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v8.i8.135
Table 2 Grading of manuscripts with key information and outcome
Ref.Study design/level of evidenceECMO patientsOutcome
Abouliatim et al[27], 2012Brief Communication; Level 3AAA repair on ECMO support in 2 patients after failed EVARBoth patients were discharged 12 days postoperatively
Lorusso et al[28], 2019Surgical Technique; Level 32 patients requiring elective aortic arch replacement and treated with minimally invasive central ECMO, which avoids re-sternotomy and maintains antegrade blood flowSuccessful outcome for both patients. The technique is suitable only in those patients where a side-armed prosthetic graft had been used
Lazar et al[29], 2017Invited commentary; Level 3Comment to Sultan, 2017 with further considerations about ECMO in aortic dissection
Guenther et al[30], 2014Retrospective Case Review; Level 36 patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the coronary arteries treated with ECMO supportMortality 67% (4 patients)
Lin et al[31], 2018Observational Study; Level 2-510 patients with TAAD between 2007 and 2018 17 required ECMO postoperativelyComparison between low LVEF and preserved LVEF
Lin et al[32], 2017Retrospective Study; Level 2-162 patients underwent TAAD repair between 2008 and 2015 20 patients required ECMO support postoperativelyMortality: ECMO group 65%; non-ECMO group 8.5%
Factors predicting postop ECMO: haemodynamic instability; aortic cross-clamp time; postop peak creat kinase-MB
Younger age for ECMO survivors
Zhong et al[33], 2017Retrospective Study; Level 2-5637 patients underwent major aortic surgery between 2009 and 2016 36 patients required ECMO support: 20 with TAAD; 3 Type B; 12 with thoracic aortic aneurysm; 1 with CoA (aortic coarctation)Mortality 50%
Three main factors for in-hospital mortality: retrograde-flow cannulation; preop CK-MB level 100 IU/L; peak lactate level 20 mmol/L
Sultan et al[34], 2017Retrospective Study; Level 2-Database review between 2004 and 2014 35 patients with Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) underwent ECMO supportOverall mortality 88%
There is no mention about indications for ECMO support; profile and co-morbidities of these patients; cannulation site (peripheral or central); cause of death
Guihaire et al[35], 2017Retrospective Study; Level 2-92 patients required ECMO support following valve surgery (66%), acute aortic dissection (10%) and CABG (9%)Survival for patients with aortic dissection is not specified
Gennari et al[36], 2019Case Report; Level 31 patient with iatrogenic type A aortic dissection requiring ECMO supportSuccessful weaning off ECMO after 4 days
Chatterjee et al[37], 2018Case Report; Level 33 patients requiring ECMO support after thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair1 patient discharged after 128 days but died 2 months later
1 patient discharged after 35 days and alive at 3-year follow up
1 patient discharged after 19 days and alive at 6-month follow up
Beyrouti et al[38], 2018Case Report; Level 31patient with aortic dissection involving the left main stem requiring ECLS and subsequently LVADDischarged after 27 days
Yukawa et al[39], 2018Case Report; Level 3Acute aortic dissection with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring ECMO supportDischarged after 49 days
Stroehle et al[40], 2017Case Report; Level 3Traumatic aortic dissection treated with TEVAR on ECMO supportDischarged after 42 days to neuro-rehabilitation
Szczechowicz et al[41], 2016Case Report; Level 32 patients with acute type A aortic dissection complicated by right ventricular failure requiring ECMO supportFirst patient discharged after 27 days; second patient discharged to the ward after 8 days in ITU but no mention about how many days before discharge
Ishida et al[42], 2015Case Report; Level 3Two-stage procedure on ECMO support in 1 patient who sustained type A acute aortic dissection in a background of chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertensionProlonged hospital stay; no mention how many days before discharge
Yavuz et al[43], 2015Case Report; Level 3ECMO following TEVAR in 1 patientNo mention about outcome
Amako et al[44], 2013Case Report; Level 31 patient with type A aortic dissection treated with ECMO supportECMO weaned off after 65 hours uneventfully
Doguet et al[45], 2010Case Report; Level 31 patient with acute type A aortic dissection involving the coronary arteries treated with ECMO supportDischarged after 29 days postoperatively
Koster et al[46], 2007Case Report; Level 31 patient with acute type A aortic dissection requiring ECMO support who developed HIT treated successfully with bivalirudinLV recovery during VA-ECMO support but RVAD required. Successful ECMO weaning; RVAD removed after 6 weeks
Fabricius et al[47], 2001Case Report; Level 32 patients who sustained acute type A aortic dissection during pregnancy treated with ECMO supportSuccessful ECMO weaning
Yamashita et al[48], 1994Case Report; Level 31 patient with acute aortic dissection treated with ECMO supportSuccessful ECMO weaning
Jorgensen et al[49], 2019Conference Abstract; Level 3Elective femoro-femoral VA-ECMO support for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a 82-year-old patientDischarged 11 days postoperatively
Heuts et al[50], 2017Conference Abstract; Level 3Surgical technique for ECMO insertion (the Maastricht Approach)See Lorusso, 2019 in this table
Yang et al[51], 2017Conference Abstract; Level 3Retrospective analysis of 1695 patients who underwent surgery for aortic dissection between 2008 and 2015. 42 patients required VA-ECMO support30 patients were successfully weaned off VA-ECMO and 19 patients were discharged.
Higher lactate levels, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, major haemorrhage and renal replacement therapy were related to in-hospital mortality
Goldberg et al[52], 2017Conference Abstract; Level 3185 patients requiring repair of acute type A aortic dissection between 2005 and 2016. 4 patients required VA-ECMO support.All 4 patients survived to hospital discharge
Schmidt et al[53], 2016Conference Abstract; Level 3Acute type A aortic dissection presenting as acute coronary syndrome requiring ECMO support in the cath lab as a bridge to surgical interventionFatal outcome
Nierscher et al[54], 2012Conference Abstract; Level 3Observational study of patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2008. 35 patients required ECMO support. Only one patient with aortic dissection is reported.Survival not specified for the patient with aortic dissection
Shinar et al[55], 2011Conference Abstract; Level 3Observational study over a 14-mo period of ECMO support initiated by A&E physicians. The procedure was attempted in 19 patientsFour patients were discharged without neurological injury: 2 patients after MI, one after aortic dissection with cardiac tamponade and one after profound hypothermia