Clinical Practice Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2018; 7(2): 31-38
Published online May 4, 2018. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v7.i2.31
Table 4 Preferences of non-experts vs experts
ScenarioRoleBolus (% of total)Vasoactive (% of total)Other (% of total)P value
1-septic shock with ongoing lossesNon-experts1 (n = 438) Experts1 (n = 52)4047130.02
255025
2-worsening hemodynamics after intubationNon-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52)2159200.08
117316
3-shock in a child known to have cardiomyopathyNon-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52)3915460.77
421741
4-recovering anaphylactic shock with low CVPNon-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52)2921500.01
25867