Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 123372
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.123372
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.123372
Table 2 Key evidence guiding vasoactive therapy in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure
| Ref. | Population | Design | Intervention | Comparator | Primary outcome | Key findings | Clinical relevance |
| Cavallin et al[94], 2015 | Cirrhosis, HRS (n = 49) | RCT | Terlipressin 3-12 mg/day CTI + albumin | Midodrine + octreotide + albumin | Renal recovery | Terlipressin superior: Partial/complete response 70% vs 29% (P = 0.01); complete response 56% vs 5% (P < 0.001) | First head-to-head terlipressin vs midodrine/octreotide; terlipressin clearly favoured |
| Boyer et al[95], 2016 | Cirrhosis, HRS-1 (n = 196) | RCT | Terlipressin 1 mg every 6 hours + albumin | Placebo + albumin | CHRSR | CHRSR 19.6% vs 13.1% (P = 0.22; NS); creatinine reduction significantly greater (P < 0.001); survival similar | Phase 3; missed primary endpoint; HRS reversal predicted 90-day survival; more ischaemic AEs |
| Piano et al[96], 2018 | 298 patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS, stratified by ACLF grade | Retrospective multicenter cohort study | Terlipressin + albumin | Comparison according to ACLF grade (ACLF-1, ACLF-2, ACLF-3) rather than a separate treatment arm | Response to treatment (serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL at end of therapy) and 90-day mortality | Treatment response declined with increasing ACLF severity: 60% in ACLF-1, 48% in ACLF-2, and 29% in ACLF-3 (P < 0.001). ACLF grade and baseline creatinine were independently associated with treatment response. ACLF grade independently predicted 90-day mortality irrespective of HRS reversal | Key study establishing ACLF grade as determinant of terlipressin response; EASL-CLIF criteria |
| Arora et al[97], 2020 | ACLF (n = 120) | RCT | Terlipressin 2-12 mg/day CTI + albumin | Noradrenaline 0.5-3 mg/hour + albumin | HRS-AKI reversal day 7; 28-day survival | Terlipressin superior: HRS reversal 40% vs 17% (P = 0.004); survival 48% vs 20% (P = 0.001); less RRT 57% vs 80% (P = 0.006) | APASL ACLF criteria; open-label; landmark ACLF-specific RCT |
| Wong et al[98], 2021 | Cirrhosis, HRS-1 (n = 300) | RCT | Terlipressin + albumin | Placebo + albumin | HRS reversal | Verified HRS reversal 32% vs 17% (P = 0.006); no significant survival benefit; respiratory failure more frequent with terlipressin | Largest placebo-controlled terlipressin trial; pivotal study underlying FDA approval |
| Wong et al[99], 2022 | ACLF (n = 299) | Post-hoc | Terlipressin + albumin | Placebo + albumin | Respiratory failure by ACLF grade; 90-day survival | RF with terlipressin 30% in ACLF grade 3 vs 9.4% grade 1-2 (P = 0.0002); 90-day survival lower in grade 3 terlipressin arm. Use with caution in ACLF grade 3 | Basis for FDA black box warning; terlipressin contraindicated in ACLF grade 3 with hypoxia |
| Jindal et al[100], 2024 | ACLF (n = 60) | RCT | Early terlipressin (after 12 hours volume expansion) | Standard terlipressin (after 48 hours albumin challenge) | 28-day mortality; AKI reversal | Early terlipressin: Lower mortality (17% vs 43%, P = 0.03); greater AKI reversal; regression of ACLF stage | First study on timing; supports early AKI intervention before 48 hours window in ACLF |
| Gupta et al[101], 2025 | ACLF + septic shock (n = 70) | RCT | Terlipressin 2.6 mcg/kg/minute | Noradrenaline 0.1 mcg/kg/minute | MAP > 65 mmHg at 6 hours | Noradrenaline superior: MAP target achieved 74% vs 14% (P < 0.001); 3- and 7-day mortality higher with terlipressin | Terlipressin INFERIOR in septic shock context; noradrenaline first-line for ACLF septic shock |
- Citation: Kosuta I, Curcic Karabaic E, Beluhan N, Zlopasa F, Babel J. Critical care hepatology: A narrative review of current concepts and management. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(3): 123372
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i3/123372.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.123372