Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 120866
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.120866
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.120866
Table 3 Phenotype-specific clinical implications: Triage, treatment intensity, and goals of care
| Clinical phenotype | Triage and disposition | Treatment intensity | GOC strategy |
| Low risk | Standard ward | Routine monitoring: Focus on preventing functional decline | Goal alignment: Align treatment with baseline patient goals and functional priorities |
| Masked resilience | ICU/HDU | Full escalation: Aim for return to robust baseline | Justification: Explain how robust reserve justifies intensive care |
| Masked risk | AGU | High vigilance: Preserve function; prevent delirium | Proactive warning: Highlight “silent severity” and the high risk of rapid functional decline |
| High risk | ICU/HDU or AGU | Proportionality: TLT of intensive care | Thresholds: Shift focus to dignity if biological limits are met |
- Citation: Khaw MJ, Chin WV. Integrating frailty and acute illness severity scoring for risk stratification in acute geriatric care: Review and practical guide. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(3): 120866
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i3/120866.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.120866