BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 118885
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.118885
Table 6 Distress and turnover intention table, n (%)/mean ± SD
Ref.
Distress screening tool
Distress screen definition
Distress prevalence in FL 2023
mean ± SD
Results of comparison
Azoulay et al[10]VAS and intention to leave yes/noNRIntention to leave 484 (57); VAS NRNRNCG
Cheng et al[11]DASS-21 and Stress Scale of Caring for Patients with Highly-Infectious Disease> 14NRDASS-21 stress score 1324 ± 8.14; HSS 48.89 ± 18.5NCG
Qian et al[13]IES-R; change in work stress and rest time yes/noNRNRIES-R score 173 ± 12.7NS increase in work stress and decrease in rest time reported in FL vs NFL
Mohr et al[14]2 items from MBI and coronavirus disease 2019 professional stressBurnout ≥ once per week; coronavirus disease 2019 professional stress positive if answered high or extreme stress95278 (32.50)ICU had highest work stress at the start of the pandemic (48.6%) with the greater decline (12.9%) from 2020-2023 than other work areas
Xu et al[20]MBIPsychological symptom profile created: Low, moderate, and high level1300 (62.1) low level, 605 (28.9) moderate level, and 189 (9) high levelNRNCG
Zhang et al[23]Turnover Intention Scale< 6 very low; 6-12 low; 13-18 high; > 19 very highHigh turnover intention 804 (32) and very high 302 (12)NRFL 2.09 ± 0.88 vs NFL 1.85 ± 1.85, P < 0.01
Wang et al[24]MBI-HSS> 26 in EE, > 9 in D, and < 33 in PA1666 (75.38)NRNCG
Çerçizaj et al[27]DASS-21Normal 0-14, mild 15-18, moderate 19-25, severe 26-33, extremely severe ≥ 34Mild 3 (1.0), Moderate 0 (0), severe or extremely severe 0 (0)NRNR


Write to the Help Desk