Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Table 9 Comparison of stone diameter between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone diameter (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 5 (4.17) | 8 (6.67) | 13 (5.42) | 0.225 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 58 (48.33) | 50 (41.67) | 108 (45) | 0.225 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 44 (36.67) | 39 (32.50) | 83 (34.58) | 0.225 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 13 (10.83) | 23 (19.17) | 36 (15) | 0.225 |
| mean ± SD | 10.91 ± 3.53 | 11.07 ± 4.12 | 10.99 ± 3.83 | 0.749 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 10 (8-13) | 11 (8-14) | 10 (8-14) | 0.749 |
| Range | 5-19 | 5-20 | 5-20 | 0.749 |
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619