Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Table 8 Comparison of stone length between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone length (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 2 (1.67) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.83) | 0.054 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 18 (15) | 11 (9.17) | 29 (12.08) | 0.054 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 35 (29.17) | 29 (24.17) | 64 (26.67) | 0.054 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 42 (35) | 64 (53.33) | 106 (44.17) | 0.054 |
| > 20 mm | 23 (19.17) | 16 (13.33) | 39 (16.25) | 0.054 |
| mean ± SD | 15.97 ± 5.22 | 16.74 ± 4.6 | 16.35 ± 4.93 | 0.224 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 17 (12-19) | 17 (14-19.25) | 17 (13-19) | 0.224 |
| Range | 5-28 | 6-31 | 5-31 | 0.224 |
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619