Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Table 13 Comparison of stone clearance in different stone diameter between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance in different stone diameter | Group A | Group B | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 1 (20) | 7 (87.50) | 8 (61.54) | 0.032 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 31 (53.45) | 49 (98) | 80 (74.07) | < 0.0001 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 24 (54.55) | 37 (94.87) | 61 (73.49) | < 0.0001 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 11 (84.62) | 21 (91.30) | 32 (88.89) | 0.609 |
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619