Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Table 12 Comparison of stone clearance in different stone length between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance in different stone length | Group A | Group B | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 1 (50) | 0 (0) | 1 (50) | - |
| 5.1-10 mm | 11 (61.11) | 10 (90.91) | 21 (72.41) | 0.11 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 18 (51.43) | 28 (96.55) | 46 (71.88) | < 0.0001 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 21 (50) | 61 (95.31) | 82 (77.36) | < 0.0001 |
| > 20 mm | 16 (69.57) | 15 (93.75) | 31 (79.49) | 0.109 |
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619