BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 115169
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.115169
Table 2 Comparative analysis of intracranial pressure monitoring techniques in severe intraventricular hemorrhage
Technique
Accuracy
Advantages
Limitations
IVH-specific utility
EVD with ICP integrationGold standardTherapeutic drainage + monitoringInfection risk (8%-15%), occlusion by clotEnables thrombolytic administration, preferred for obstructive hydrocephalus
Parenchymal fiberoptic± 2 mmHgLow infection risk, compartment-specific dataDrift > 1 mmHg/day, no therapeutic functionEssential for large parenchymal extensions (> 15 mL)
ONSD ultrasoundUnstable, sensitivity 90%, specificity 60%-85%Rapid bedside applicationOverestimates ICP in acute hydrocephalusBest for rapid triage when EVD unavailable
TCD pulsatility indexr = 0.68 with ICPAutoregulation assessmentOperator-dependent, limited temporal windowsCPP titration during vasopressor use


Write to the Help Desk