©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 113684
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113684
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113684
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of oxygen delivery requirements by BRIXIA and Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema scores
| Crude OR (95%CI) | P value | a-OR1 (95%CI) | P value | a-OR2 (95%CI) | P value | |
| BRIXIA score | ||||||
| Oxygen delivery device in ED | ||||||
| Model 1: Room air | 0.9 (0.87-0.92) | < 0.001 | 0.9 (0.87-0.93) | < 0.001 | ||
| Model 2: Nasal cannula | 1.05 (1.02-1.08) | 0.001 | 1.05 (1.02-1.08) | 0.002 | ||
| Model 3: Hudson mask | 0.92 (0.84-1.02) | 0.108 | 0.93 (0.84-1.02) | 0.134 | ||
| Model 4: NRBM | 1.15 (1.1-1.21) | < 0.001 | 1.15 (1.09-1.21) | < 0.001 | ||
| Model 5: HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP | 1.27 (1.14-1.42) | < 0.001 | 1.27 (1.14-1.41) | < 0.001 | ||
| Oxygen delivery device during hospitalization | ||||||
| Model 6: Nasal cannula | 1.01 (0.95-1.07) | 0.784 | 1 (0.95-1.06) | 0.868 | 1.04 (0.97-1.1) | 0.249 |
| Model 7: Hudson mask | 1.02 (0.91-1.14) | 0.761 | 1.01 (0.9-1.14) | 0.830 | 0.99 (0.88-1.12) | 0.898 |
| Model 8: NRBM | 1.13 (1.1-1.16) | < 0.001 | 1.12 (1.09-1.16) | < 0.001 | 1.09 (1.06-1.13) | < 0.001 |
| Model 9: HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP | 1.12 (1.08-1.16) | < 0.001 | 1.11 (1.07-1.15) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (1.01-1.09) | 0.018 |
| Model 10: Oral intubation/tracheostomy | 1.11 (1.07-1.16) | < 0.001 | 1.1 (1.06-1.15) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (1-1.09) | 0.049 |
| RALE score | ||||||
| Oxygen delivery device in ED | ||||||
| Model 14: Room air | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | < 0.001 | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | < 0.001 | ||
| Model 15: Nasal cannula | 1.01 (1-1.02) | 0.040 | 1.01 (1-1.02) | 0.065 | ||
| Model 16: Hudson mask | 0.98 (0.94-1.02) | 0.417 | 0.99 (0.95-1.03) | 0.485 | ||
| Model 17: NRBM | 1.05 (1.04-1.07) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (1.03-1.07) | < 0.001 | ||
| Model 18: HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP | 1.07 (1.04-1.11) | < 0.001 | 1.07 (1.04-1.11) | < 0.001 | ||
| Oxygen delivery device during hospitalization | ||||||
| Model 19: Nasal cannula | 1 (0.97-1.02) | 0.842 | 1 (0.97-1.02) | 0.760 | 1.01 (0.99-1.04) | 0.358 |
| Model 20: Hudson mask | 1.02 (0.98-1.07) | 0.316 | 1.02 (0.98-1.07) | 0.356 | 1.01 (0.96-1.06) | 0.733 |
| Model 21: NRBM | 1.05 (1.04-1.06) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (1.03-1.06) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (1.02-1.05) | < 0.001 |
| Model 22: HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP | 1.04 (1.03-1.06) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (1.02-1.05) | < 0.001 | 1.02 (1-1.03) | 0.037 |
| Model 23: Oral intubation/tracheostomy | 1.04 (1.03-1.06) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (1.02-1.05) | < 0.001 | 1.02 (1-1.04) | 0.042 |
- Citation: Mohammed H, Y Fadul K, Naqvi SGA, Kharma N, Alfian Yusof A, Ahmad S, Farooq M, Javid S, Mohamed A, Abdel-Rahman ME, Harris T. Use of radiograph scoring systems to assess pulmonary disease severity in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(1): 113684
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i1/113684.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113684