BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 113684
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113684
Table 2 Performance of BRIXIA and Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema scores for predicting oxygen delivery device and discharge outcomes in the emergency department and during hospitalization
BRIXIA score
Cut-off point (95%CI)
Sensitivity
Specificity
AUC at cut-point (95%CI)
Oxygen delivery device in ED
Room air7 (6-8)0.430.390.41 (0.38-0.44)
Nasal cannula8 (7-9)0.510.600.56 (0.52-0.59)
Hudson mask9 (6-12)0.360.610.49 (0.38-0.59)
NRBM9 (8-10)0.660.640.65 (0.60-0.70)
HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP12 (9-15)0.650.840.74 (0.64-0.85)
Oxygen delivery device during hospitalization
Nasal cannula6 (4-8)0.600.480.54 (0.47-0.61)
Hudson mask13 (6-20)0.290.860.57 (0.42-0.72)
NRBM8 (7-9)0.580.660.62 (0.59-0.65)
HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP8 (7-9)0.630.610.62 (0.58-0.66)
Oral intubation/tracheostomy8 (6-10)0.650.600.63 (0.58-0.67)
RALE score
Oxygen delivery device in ED
Room air12 (8-16)0.490.570.42 (0.39-0.45)
Nasal cannula10 (7-13)0.580.570.54 (0.51-0.57)
Hudson mask14 (8-20)0.410.610.54 (0.43-0.64)
NRBM16 (10-22)0.540.720.62 (0.57-0.68)
HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP17 (12-22)0.650.770.74 (0.65-0.83)
Oxygen delivery device during hospitalization
Nasal cannula12 (6-18)0.290.850.52 (0.46-0.59)
Hudson mask13 (0-29)0.580.650.55 (0.42-0.69)
NRBM13 (10-16)0.640.610.6 (0.57-0.63)
HFNC/CPAP/BiPAP16 (11-21)0.660.590.59 (0.55-0.64)
Oral intubation/tracheostomy16 (12-20)0.520.360.62 (0.57-0.66)


Write to the Help Desk