©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Table 7 Complications in the video laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway groups, n (%)
| Complication | Video laryngoscope group (n = 32) | Intubating laryngeal mask airway group (n = 26) | P value |
| Peri-intubation mouth damage | 0 (0.0) | 7 (26.9) | χ2 = 9.798; df = 1; P = 0.002 |
| Post-extubation dysphagia | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Post-extubation sore throat | 1 (3.1) | 7 (26.9) | χ2 = 6.832; df = 1; P = 0.009 |
| Peri-intubation teeth damage | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Post-extubation hoarseness | 1 (3.1) | 3 (11.5) | χ2 = 1.581; df = 1; P = 0.209 |
| Peri-intubation esophageal intubation | 1 (3.1) | 2 (7.7) | χ2 = 0.610; df = 1; P = 0.435 |
- Citation: Aggarwal A, Mustahsin M, Shishir P. Comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway and video laryngoscope during emergency intubation in patients who are critically ill. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(1): 112345
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i1/112345.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345