©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Table 4 Time taken for intubation in the video laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway groups
| Airway management values of patients | Video laryngoscope group (n = 32) | Intubating laryngeal mask airway group (n = 26) | P value |
| Insertion time (seconds) | 18.75 ± 10.2 | 24.92 ± 8.1 | t = -2.497; P = 0.015 |
| Intubation time (seconds) | 25.63 ± 14.5 | 57.2 ± 14.7 | t = -8.212; P ≤ 0.001 |
| Total intubation time (seconds) | 44.0 ± 19.7 | 82.5 ± 14.5 | t = 8.56; P ≤ 0.001 |
- Citation: Aggarwal A, Mustahsin M, Shishir P. Comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway and video laryngoscope during emergency intubation in patients who are critically ill. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(1): 112345
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i1/112345.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345