Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 108272
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.108272
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.108272
Table 1 Summary of the various prediction scores to predict weaning failure
Scoring method | Interpretation | Uses | Limitations |
1 Morganroth scale | Score of < 55 predicts successful weaning | Applied to patients requiring short-term and long-term mechanical ventilation | Limited data |
2 RSBI | Score of < 105 predicts successful weaning | Easy to calculate | Can be confounded by multiple patient factors |
3 CROP index | Score of > 13 mL/breath/min predicts successful weaning | Includes respiratory and ventilator parameters | Cannot be used in neuro patients |
4 Gluck and Corgian score | Score of < 3 predicts successful weaning | Simple bedside measurement | Not validated in large studies |
5 BWAP | Score of > 50 predicts successful weaning | Comprehensive weaning checklist | Limited data |
6 Modified Burns Wean Assessment Program | Score of > 60 predicts successful weaning | Useful for long-term mechanical ventilation | Limited data |
7 Persian weaning tool | Score of > 50 suggests readiness to wean | Similar to BWAP | Limited data |
8 HACOR scoring | Score of > 5 predicts weaning failure | Easy bedside tool | Limited data |
9 WEANS NOW | Score of 1 or more predicts weaning failure | Multiple parameters included | Complex |
10 ExPreS | Score of > 59 has a high probability of extubation success | Simple tool, shown to reduce extubation failure rates | Not validated in large studies |
- Citation: Gaddam M, Gullapalli D, Adrish ZA, Reddy AY, Adrish M. Predicting weaning failure from invasive mechanical ventilation: The promise and pitfalls of clinical prediction scores. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 108272
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i3/108272.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.108272