Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 105645
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105645
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105645
Table 9 Summary of intracranial pressure managing protocols
ICE protocol | CREVICE protocol | SIBICC protocol | B-ICONIC protocol | |
Setting | BEST-TRIP study (Latin America, limited resources) | Post-BEST-TRIP refinement (Latin America, limited resources) | High-resource ICU with access to invasive multimodal monitoring | Low-resource settings without access to invasive monitoring |
Type of monitoring | Non-invasive ICP monitoring | Non-invasive ICP monitoring | ICP ± brain oxygen monitoring (PbtO2) | Non-invasive ICP monitoring |
Trigger for protocol activation | GCS ≤ 8 with abnormal CT scan | Suspected intracranial hypertension (SICH): 1 major or 2 minor criteria (e.g., imaging, age, motor response, hypotension) | Elevated ICP and/or low PbtO2 | SICH plus ≥ 2 abnormal non-invasive findings (see below) |
Basis for monitoring | Serial clinical exams and CT scans | Clinical exams and CT; revised with definitions of neuroworsening and structured de-escalation | Continuous ICP and/or PbtO2 values with tiered thresholds | Four non-invasive markers: (1) ONSD; (2) pulsatility index (3) estimated ICP via TCD; and (4) NPi on pupillometry |
Threshold for escalation | Clinical or radiological neuroworsening | Neuroworsening or failure of Tier 1 therapy | ICP ≥ 22 mmHg, PbtO2 < 20 mmHg, or clinical deterioration | Two or more non-invasive abnormalities, or clinical worsening |
Treatment Strategy (Tiers) | Aggressive from outset; includes hyperosmolar therapy, hyperventilation, barbiturates, decompressive craniectomy | Tiered escalation (Tier 1 to Tier 3); last treatment in should be first out | Tiered algorithm with increasing intensity and risk (Tier 1 to 3), individualized per ICP and PbtO2 status | Uses CREVICE framework with adapted triggers; relies on availability of non-invasive modalities |
De-escalation guidance | Not clearly structured; based on improvement or repeat imaging | Defined matrix combining imaging and neuro exam (pupils, motor score); last treatment added is first to be withdrawn | Heatmap and structured matrix based on ICP/PbtO2; includes neuroworsening and “tier zero” baseline care | Structured de-escalation using improvement of non-invasive markers and clinical status |
Limitations | Aggressive, CT-dependent, lacks flexibility for mild cases | Still CT-dependent; subjective criteria for SICH; limited data validation | Based on expert consensus (Delphi method), lacks RCT validation | Dependent on accuracy of non-invasive markers; potential for false-positives or over-treatment |
Unique features | First consensus protocol for ICP-unmonitored patients; used in RCT | Adds clarity on neuroworsening, introduces structured de-escalation | Integrates ICP and brain oxygenation; includes “MAP challenge” and not recommended interventions list | First consensus using only non-invasive data; bridges evidence gap in LMICs |
- Citation: Bianchini L, Matos PMPG, Roepke RML, Besen BAMP. Management of intracranial hypertension with and without invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 105645
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i3/105645.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105645