Outcome of colonoscopic decompression in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Outcome of individual studies included in the analysis, n (%)

Ref.	No. of patients	Initial success	Overall success	Perforation	Recurrence after decompression	Need for surgery overall after successful decompression
Nivatvongs et al[9]	22	19 (86.4)	19 (86.4)	0	4/19 (21.0)	3/22 (13.6) | 2/19 (10.5)
Strodel et al[10]	44	32 (72.7)	34 (77.3)	1 (2.3)	5/34 (14.7)	7/44 (15.9) | 1/34 (2.9)
Bode et al[11]	22	20 (91)	20 (91)	1 (4.5)	4/20 (20)	3/22 (13.6) | 2/20 (10)
Fausel and Goff [12]	19	-	17 (89.5)	0	3/17 (17.6)	3/19 (15.8) | 2/17 (11.8)
Lavignolle et al[13]	29	-	29 (100)	0	7/29 (24.1)	-
Harig et al[14]	20	18 (90)	20 (100)	0	4/20 (20)	-
Jetmore et al[15]	45	29 (64.4)	38 (84.4)	1 (2.2)	6/38 (15.8)	5/45 (11.1)
Geller et al[16]	50	39 (78)	44 (88)	1 (2)	8/44 (18.2)	1/50 (2)
Pham et al[17]	24	22 (91)	23 (95.8)	0	-	-
Tsirline et al[18]	52	39 (75)	44 (85)	1 (1.9)	-	-
Peker et al[19]	54	44 (81.5)	-	-	-	-
Zhao et al[20]	59	27 (45)	-	-	-	-
Mankaney et al[21]	83	73 (87.9)	-	0	11 (15.1)	-
Liu 2021[22]	24	22 (91.6)	23 (95.8)	1 (4.2)	-	1/24 (4.2) | 1/23 (4.3)
Joechle et al[23]	25	17 (68)	-	6 (24)	-	8/25 (32) | 0/17
Williamson et al[24]	16	11 (68.7)	-	0	1/11 (9.1)	1/16 (6.2) | 0/11