Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 102733
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102733
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis, n (%)
Ref.
Study design, country
No. of patients
Age
Male sex
Etiology
Cecal diameter, in cm
Prior neostigmine
Tube placement
Nivatvongs et al[9]Retrospective, United States2256 (30-82)15 (68.2)Post-surgical: 18 (81.8); Critically ill: 4 (18.2)--0
Strodel et al[10]Retrospective, United States4459 (25-89)31 (70.4)Post-surgical: 12 (27); Critically ill: 29 (66)12.8 (9.5-17)-0
Bode et al[11]Retrospective, United States2264.3 (21-92)15 (68.2)Post-surgical: 13 (59.1); Critically ill: 9 (40.9)12.9 (10-17)-0
Fausel and Goff[12]Retrospective, United States1946-8017 (89.4)Post-surgical: 8 (42.1); Critically ill: 11 (57.9)13 (12-15)--
Lavignolle et al[13]Retrospective, France29-----15 (51.7)
Harig et al[14]Retrospective, United States2060-7812 (60)Post-surgical: 8 (40); Critically ill: 12 (60)--10 (52.6)
Jetmore et al[15]Retrospective, United States4867 (36-90)33 (68.7)Post-surgical: 27 (56); Critically ill: 21 (44)12.4-42 (87)
Geller et al[16]Retrospective, United States5068 ± 1333 (66)Post-surgical: 33 (66); Critically ill: 17 (34)13 (9-20)-42 (84)
Pham et al[17]Retrospective, United States2465 (34-85)20 (83)Post-surgical: 9 (38); Critically ill: 15 (62)12.6 ± 3.1-8 (75)
Tsirline et al[18]Retrospective, United States52------
Peker et al[19]Retrospective, Turkey5459.4 ± 15.3--10.8 ± 1.216 (30.2)-
Zhao et al[20]Prospective, China59----59 (100)-
Mankaney et al[21]Retrospective, United States8366.8 ± 16.260 (72.3)Post-surgical: 27 (32.5); Critically ill: 13 (54.2)-25 (30)-
Liu et al[22]Retrospective, United States2472.2 (51-93)19 (79.2)Post-surgical: 11 (45.8); Critically ill: 13 (54.2)12.5-14 (58.3)
Joechle et al[23]Retrospective, Germany2564 (34-86)19 (76)Critically ill: 25 (100)9 (6-13)-19 (76)
Williamson et al[24]Retrospective, United States1668 (62-84)12 (73)----