©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2024; 13(3): 94157
Published online Sep 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157
Published online Sep 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157
Table 3 Techniques for confirming thoracic epidural catheter position
| Technique | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Electrophysiological stimulation | Connecting nerve stimulator to catheter | High sensitivity and effectiveness in confirming position | Requires specialized adaptor |
| Applying current and assessing motor response | Correlation with adequate postoperative analgesia | Discomfort to awake patient | |
| Bilateral stimulation indicates proximity to nerve root | Does not give information on local spread | ||
| Limb or truncal response indicates epidural space | |||
| Epidural catheter waveform | Connecting catheter to pressure transducer | Simple technique using readily available equipment | Does not provide information about catheter level or injectate spread |
| Confirming epidural space when pulsatile waveform is obtained | |||
| Contrast epidurography | Taking X-ray after injection of radio-opaque contrast | Confirms epidural position and assesses catheter level and spread pattern | Involves X-ray, may not be suitable for all patients |
| Assessing contrast spread and catheter placement | Identifies anatomical variances and coiling/kinking | Time-consuming. Required training for epiduralgram interpretation | |
| Evaluating bilateral spread and vertebral levels | Risk of transiently raising spinal cord pressure with large volumes |
- Citation: Kumar K, Horner F, Aly M, Nair GS, Lin C. Why do thoracic epidurals fail? A literature review on thoracic epidural failure and catheter confirmation. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13(3): 94157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v13/i3/94157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157