Impact of technology on indications and limitations for transanal surgical removal of rectal neoplasms

doi:10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (12030)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

545

WORD

280

HTML

7833

Figures (1-4)

490

Tables (1-5)

366

Sum=9514

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1196

Download

1320

Sum=2516

Mar 28, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (4)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Surgical Procedures

ISSN

2219-2832

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 1-13
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Conventional transanal excision with the patient in prone-jackknife position. A: Anus at beginning of the surgery; B: Placement of Lone Star retractor; C: Additional hand-held retractor optimizes exposure; D: Direct transanal instrumentation under regular view.

Citation: Devaraj B, Kaiser AM. Impact of technology on indications and limitations for transanal surgical removal of rectal neoplasms. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(1): 1-13
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i1/1.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1