Feasibility and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic rectal resection following neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: A systematic review

Table 3 Studies from which data could not be extracted (sub group analysis not described/reported)

Ref.	Year	Country	Type of study	Percent having LCRT in Lap group
van der Pas et al[5]	2013	The Netherlands	RCT1	59
Lujan et al[6]	2009	Spain	RCT	72.3
Lujan et al[16]	2013	Spain	Case Control	58.1
McKay et al[17]	2012	Australia	Case Control	48.8
Laurent et al[18]	2011	France	Case Control	93.6
Patel et al[19]	2011	United States	Case Matched	50
Li et al[20]	2011	China	Case Control	34.5
Kellokumpu et al[21]	2011	Finland	Case Control	34
Greenblatt et al[22]	2011	United States	Case Control	31.6
da Luz Moreira et al[23]	2011	United States	Case Matched	33
Baik et al[24]	2010	United States	Case Matched	79.6
Westerholm et al[25]	2012	Canada	Case Series	7.4
Jefferies et al[26]	2011	United Kingdom	Case Series	43.8
Glancy et al[27]	2011	United Kingdom	Case Series	8
Lam et al[28]	2010	Belgium	Case Series	56.7
Sartori et al[29]	2010	Italy	Case Series	39.1
Cheung et al[30]	2010	Hong Kong	Case Series	21.5
Park et al[31]	2010	South Korea	Case Series	8.1

¹Patients in this trial had short course radio therapy. LCRT: Long course chemo-radiotherapy; RCT: Randomized controlled trial.