Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Surg Proced. Sep 16, 2026; 16(2): 124162
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.124162
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.124162
Table 1 Strengths and limitations of each technique in inguinal hernia
| Technique | Major strengths | Major limitations |
| Open repair | Lowest cost; can be performed under local anaesthesia; short operative time; universally available; excellent long-term outcomes | Slightly greater early postoperative pain and slower recovery |
| Laparoscopic repair | Less postoperative pain; earlier return to work; preferred for bilateral and recurrent hernias | Requires general anaesthesia; steeper learning curve |
| Robotic repair | Improved ergonomics and dexterity; excellent visualization; easier intracorporeal suturing | Highest cost; longer operative time; limited availability; no proven superiority in major clinical outcomes |
- Citation: Bhattacharya K. International guidelines for groin hernia management: Do they have a vested interest? World J Surg Proced 2026; 16(2): 124162
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v16/i2/124162.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.124162