BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 124374
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.124374
Table 2 Author-derived taxonomy of parental-involvement strategies and implementation considerations
Strategy
Definition
Likely clinical value
Implementation implications
Passive physical presenceParent is physically present but has no clearly defined therapeutic roleMay reduce separation distress in selected children, but effects at induction are inconsistentLow resource, but vulnerable to anxiety transmission and staff distraction
Active parental participationParent provides touch, eye contact, calm verbal reassurance, distraction, or helps with mask acceptanceMore plausible mechanism; active participation outperformed passive presence in one RCTRequires brief training, role scripting, and staff agreement
Coached or prepared presenceParent receives behavioral guidance before induction and is instructed in coping-promoting behaviorsAppears more promising than unstructured presence; aligns with ADVANCE and virtual coaching evidenceRequires standardized preoperative education and staff time
Multimodal parental involvementPresence combined with sedative premedication, dexmedetomidine, clown therapy, preparation, or distractionMay be useful as part of individualized pathways; not consistently additive to midazolamShould be protocolized to avoid duplicative or unnecessary interventions
Virtual parental presenceParent provides real-time or recorded audiovisual presence without entering the ORFeasible and potentially useful when physical presence is impractical; evidence remains pilot-levelMay reduce infection-control and workflow barriers; needs technology reliability


Write to the Help Desk