Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 122141
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.122141
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.122141
Table 3 Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of domperidone in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children
| Ref. | Participants, n (age range) | Cases/controls | Design | Outcome | Comments on the study |
| De Loore et al[111], 1979 | 47 (3 weeks to 8 years) | Children with regurgitation/vomiting | Blinded RCT with placebo-controlled arm; domperidone vs metoclopramide vs placebo | Domperidone was superior to a placebo. Domperidone proved to be superior in reducing symptoms compared to metoclopramide | Assessment of symptoms of younger children, especially regurgitation, may have been problematic |
| Carroccio, et al[112], 1994 | 80 (1-18 months) | GERD with no erosion. All children were assessed with upper GI endoscopy and pH study | Blinded RCT: Group 1: Domperidone with magnesium hydroxide + aluminium hydroxide; Group 2: Domperidone with alginate; Group 3: Domperidone; Group 4: Placebo, duration 8 weeks | Group 1 showed significant improvement of symptoms and reflux index compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.018 and P < 0.034 respectively). The domperidone group reported fewer reflux episodes (59 vs 48.5, P < 0.009) and improvement in clinical score before and after treatment (P < 0.04) | A well-conducted study with real-life use of domperidone combined with antacids or alginates. The control group was also appropriate. Assessment was done with pH |
| Bines et al[113], 1992 | 17 (5 months to 12 years) | GERD is unresponsive to non-pharmacological treatments and confirmed with pH studies | Blinded RCT with domperidone and placebo arms for 8 weeks | No significant difference in symptom improvement. Only 25% reduction in postprandial reflux episodes in children on domperidone | A small number of patients; age range varies widely, and it could be difficult to assess symptoms in younger children; randomization was not clear; some patients had other diseases |
| Grill et al[114], 1985 | 15 (3-13 months) | Babies with symptoms of GERD, like vomiting, spitting, coughing, irritability, and choking, after 2 weeks of non-pharmacological interventions | Open-label study with domperidone for 6 weeks | Improvement of the mean symptom score at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. Reduction of post-prandial reflux time and peristaltic esophageal contractions | The study's open-label design makes it difficult to interpret the results |
| Hegar et al[115], 2009 | 20 (2-9 months) | Symptomatic GERD not responding to conservative interventions | Randomized, investigator-blind, open label trial domperidone vs cisapride for 4 weeks | Both drugs were equally effective in reducing the daily frequency of regurgitation, reducing the trends of reflux index, and the number of refluxes/24 hours. No statistical difference between drugs | The open-label nature of the prescription makes it difficult to interpret results. However, the authors have randomized the population, and the investigators are blinded |
| Cresi et al[116], 2008 | 26 term and preterm neonates | Symptomatic GERD not responding to non-pharmacological interventions | Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Domperidone was given at 8 hours and 16 hours during a 24-hour pH recording with a meal | Increase in reflux frequency and reduction in reflux duration in the group receiving domperidone | The open-label nature of the study makes it difficult to interpret the results. Assessment of symptoms in preterm babies could have been misinterpreted |
- Citation: Devanarayana NM, Rajindrajith S. Gastric motility abnormalities in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comprehensive review of mechanisms and therapeutic implications. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 122141
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i4/122141.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.122141