BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 120900
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120900
Table 2 Detailed outcomes (functional, radiological, and complications) of the included patients
Ref.Follow up period (months)Functional outcomeRadiological outcomeComplicationsHardware removal
d’Oliveira and Craviotto[22], 20236No pain - no limitation of daily activities - DASH score was zeroAdequate bony union was achieved, and no displacement or rotational malalignmentNoneNR
Ayık et al[23], 202529.1 (24-36)10 patients had normal finger function; 1 patient had mild restrictionFracture union was achieved within the first month in 9 patients, and within 2 months in 2 patients. No signs of joint degenerationNoneNo routine removal was recommended. One patient had a retrograde screw removal at the parents’ request
ROM compared with the contralateral side showed the following deficits: MCP joint: 1.8 (range 0-10), PIP joint: 2.7 (range: 0-10), and DIP joint: 0.9 (range: 0-10)
Pain VAS score of 0.09 (range: 0-1)
Functional VAS score of 9.7 (range: 8-10)
Aesthetic satisfaction VAS score of 9.9 (range: 9-10)
Grip strength showed an average 10% (range: 0-20) deficit compared to the contralateral hand (tested in patients > 10 years of age)
Overall, 10 patients had excellent outcomes, while 1 had a good outcome1
Maes et al[21], 202512Full finger ROM was restored after 4 weeks postoperativelyStable screw positioning without any signs of breakage or loosening- no degeneration at the PIP jointNoneNeither performed nor planned
At 1 year, finger length growth was normal - no pain - full ROM in all fingers and a symmetrical power grip


Write to the Help Desk