Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 120301
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120301
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120301
Table 3 Comparison of all-inside and inside-out ramp repair techniques
| Techniques | All-inside[38,39] | Inside-out[40] |
| Advantages | Less invasive, no posterior incision required, potentially faster surgical time | Allows for multiple sutures, more precisely placed sutures, in either vertical or oblique mattress patterns, providing superior compression. Lower risk of iatrogenic meniscal damage from smaller needles |
| Disadvantages | Device size may be cumbersome in smaller paediatric knees | Requires a separate posteromedial incision and carries a higher risk of injury to the saphenous nerve |
| Larger needle bores can cause a “cheese-wire” effect on the meniscus, although no evidence in literature details this; effects may be amplified in the softer, more vascularized pediatric meniscus. Risk of anchor-related complications (synovitis, chondral damage) | ||
| Technical Considerations | Requires knee flexion and valgus force to open the medial compartment | Careful posteromedial portal creation with transillumination to identify the saphenous vessel (and therefore nerve), and blunt dissection/introduction |
| Precise needle depth control to avoid over-penetration |
- Citation: Lim Y, Bonner T, Wood L, Moss V, Van Niekerk L, Volpin A. Meniscocapsular ramp lesions in the paediatric knee: A review of diagnosis and surgical management. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 120301
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i4/120301.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.120301