BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 120301
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120301
Table 3 Comparison of all-inside and inside-out ramp repair techniques
Techniques
All-inside[38,39]
Inside-out[40]
AdvantagesLess invasive, no posterior incision required, potentially faster surgical timeAllows for multiple sutures, more precisely placed sutures, in either vertical or oblique mattress patterns, providing superior compression. Lower risk of iatrogenic meniscal damage from smaller needles
DisadvantagesDevice size may be cumbersome in smaller paediatric kneesRequires a separate posteromedial incision and carries a higher risk of injury to the saphenous nerve
Larger needle bores can cause a “cheese-wire” effect on the meniscus, although no evidence in literature details this; effects may be amplified in the softer, more vascularized pediatric meniscus. Risk of anchor-related complications (synovitis, chondral damage)
Technical ConsiderationsRequires knee flexion and valgus force to open the medial compartmentCareful posteromedial portal creation with transillumination to identify the saphenous vessel (and therefore nerve), and blunt dissection/introduction
Precise needle depth control to avoid over-penetration


Write to the Help Desk