Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 119251
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.119251
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.119251
Table 4 Mean rectal diameter at each visit by baseline rectal diameter group
| Variables | Mean (95%CI) | Mean change from baseline (95%CI) | P value |
| Group A (RD < 3 cm) (n = 29) | |||
| Baseline | 2.35 (2.17-2.54) | ||
| Week 1 | 2.32 (2.16-2.47) | -0.04 (-0.28-0.21) | 0.774 |
| Week 4 | 2.30 (2.15-2.46) | -0.05 (-0.30-0.19) | 0.686 |
| Week 8 | 2.17 (2.00-2.34) | -0.18 (-0.45-0.08) | 0.177 |
| Group B (RD ≥ 3 cm) (n = 15) | |||
| Baseline | 3.33 (3.10-3.57) | ||
| Week 1 | 2.75 (2.53-2.96) | -0.59 (-0.90 to -0.28) | < 0.001 |
| Week 4 | 2.73 (2.52-2.95) | -0.60 (-0.93 to -0.28) | < 0.001 |
| Week 8 | 2.63 (2.39-2.87) | -0.70 (-1.05 to -0.35) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Tran DL, Pinyoying N, Sintusek P. Rectal diameter measured by transabdominal ultrasonography for monitoring treatment response in children with functional constipation. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 119251
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i4/119251.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.119251