BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 120971
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120971
Table 3 Comparison of early-onset sepsis management strategies
Feature
Categorical risk-based approach (e.g., NICE/CDC)
Sepsis risk calculator
Serial physical examination
PopulationTerm and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks)Term and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks)Term and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks)
Management logicStatic risk factor–based (maternal and perinatal factors)Multivariate, individualised risk estimation using Bayesian model (maternal + infant clinical status)Dynamic, repeated clinical assessments over time (evolving clinical signs)
Approach to treatmentLow threshold for investigation and empirical antibiotics based on risk factorsRisk-stratified approach guiding observation, investigation, or antibioticsAntibiotics reserved for infants with evolving or persistent clinical signs
Antibiotic useHigher antibiotic exposure; risk of overtreatmentReduced antibiotic use (commonly 30%-50% reduction)Reduced antibiotic use (50% reduction demonstrated in observational studies)
Safety dataHigh sensitivity; widely accepted safety profileObservational studies show no increase in missed EOS, morbidity, or mortality; lower sensitivity vs categorical approaches reportedLarge observational studies show reduced antibiotic use without increase in adverse outcomes
StrengthsSimple, reproducible, widely implemented; aligns with institutional risk toleranceIndividualised risk assessment; supports antibiotic stewardship; widely adoptedPatient-centred; avoids unnecessary treatment; detects evolving illness
LimitationsPoor specificity; high rates of unnecessary antibiotic useLower sensitivity in some studies; potential delay in treatment; derived from United States populations; relies on accurate input dataResource-intensive; requires frequent assessments, experienced clinicians, and robust systems; inter-observer variability
Implementation considerationsEasy to apply across settings; minimal training requiredRequires calculator access, local incidence calibration, and auditRequires adequate staffing, workflow support, escalation systems, and consistent documentation
GeneralisabilityWidely applicable across different healthcare settingsMay require adaptation for different populations and EOS incidenceMore feasible in well-resourced settings with adequate staffing and monitoring capacity


Write to the Help Desk