Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 120971
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120971
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120971
Table 3 Comparison of early-onset sepsis management strategies
| Feature | Categorical risk-based approach (e.g., NICE/CDC) | Sepsis risk calculator | Serial physical examination |
| Population | Term and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks) | Term and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks) | Term and late preterm infants (≥ 34 weeks) |
| Management logic | Static risk factor–based (maternal and perinatal factors) | Multivariate, individualised risk estimation using Bayesian model (maternal + infant clinical status) | Dynamic, repeated clinical assessments over time (evolving clinical signs) |
| Approach to treatment | Low threshold for investigation and empirical antibiotics based on risk factors | Risk-stratified approach guiding observation, investigation, or antibiotics | Antibiotics reserved for infants with evolving or persistent clinical signs |
| Antibiotic use | Higher antibiotic exposure; risk of overtreatment | Reduced antibiotic use (commonly 30%-50% reduction) | Reduced antibiotic use (50% reduction demonstrated in observational studies) |
| Safety data | High sensitivity; widely accepted safety profile | Observational studies show no increase in missed EOS, morbidity, or mortality; lower sensitivity vs categorical approaches reported | Large observational studies show reduced antibiotic use without increase in adverse outcomes |
| Strengths | Simple, reproducible, widely implemented; aligns with institutional risk tolerance | Individualised risk assessment; supports antibiotic stewardship; widely adopted | Patient-centred; avoids unnecessary treatment; detects evolving illness |
| Limitations | Poor specificity; high rates of unnecessary antibiotic use | Lower sensitivity in some studies; potential delay in treatment; derived from United States populations; relies on accurate input data | Resource-intensive; requires frequent assessments, experienced clinicians, and robust systems; inter-observer variability |
| Implementation considerations | Easy to apply across settings; minimal training required | Requires calculator access, local incidence calibration, and audit | Requires adequate staffing, workflow support, escalation systems, and consistent documentation |
| Generalisability | Widely applicable across different healthcare settings | May require adaptation for different populations and EOS incidence | More feasible in well-resourced settings with adequate staffing and monitoring capacity |
- Citation: Kandhari A, Jagga M, Banerjee S. Antibiotic stewardship in the context of management of early onset neonatal sepsis-an evolving paradigm shift. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 120971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i3/120971.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.120971