BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 115963
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.115963
Table 4 Comparative overview of controlled attenuation parameter, liver stiffness measurement, and shear wave elastography
Feature
CAP
LSM-transient elastography)
SWE/ARFI
Biological targetHepatic fat accumulation (steatosis)Fibrosis, inflammation, and parenchymal stiffnessFibrosis and parenchymal elasticity distribution
Primary determinantFat-induced ultrasound attenuationShear-wave propagation velocity (mechanical vibration)Acoustic radiation force impulse-induced shear-wave velocity
Measurement unitdB/mkPam/second (or converted to kPa)
1Correlation with insulin resistanceModerate (r approximately 0.30-0.40)Strong (r approximately 0.50-0.65)Strong (r approximately 0.45-0.60)
Best correlated IR indexHOMA-IR, fasting insulinAdipo-IR, METS-IRAdipo-IR, METS-IR
Clinical roleEarly detection and metabolic risk screeningDisease staging and progression monitoringQuantitative fibrosis mapping with spatial visualization
Affected byObesity, hepatic heterogeneityInflammation, postprandial stateDepth of measurement, acoustic window, probe alignment
Main advantageSensitive to early metabolic derangementsWell validated for fibrosis; rapid and reproducibleProvides 2D stiffness map; higher spatial resolution; real-time visualization
Main limitationLimited fibrosis predictionLimited assessment of steatosisOperator-dependent; affected by motion and depth artifacts
Optimal useScreening and monitoring of steatosis regressionPrognostic follow-up and fibrosis surveillanceAdvanced fibrosis characterization and research applications in heterogeneous tissues


Write to the Help Desk