BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 114054
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.114054
Table 2 Comparative characteristics of the four included studies
Ref.
Wong et al[20]
Luo et al[21]
Pilar-Orive et al[22]
Shubin et al[23]
Setting/design17-center PICU; prospective observational diagnostic biomarker studySingle-center; nested case-control; pneumonia-derived sepsisSingle-center; analytical observational case-control studySingle-center PICU/cardiac intensive care unit; prospective observational, proteomics
Number (analyzed) and age231 (vs 61 control group); noted multicenter; ≤ 10 years90 discovery samples pooled (20 controls); enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays validation (n = 35). Age strata: Infants (7-12 months), toddlers (13-36 months)40 septic children (vs 24 healthy donors); 1 month to 16 years35 sepsis (vs 28 control); 1 sepsis outlier removed 34 sepsis analyzed, 1-8 years
Specimen and timingSerum; within first 24 hoursPlasma; processed ≤ 24 hours; -80 °C storage; top-12 depletionSerum; single draw (study baseline)Serum; day-1 post-presentation/CPB (per cohort definitions)
ComparatorsSystemic inflammatory response syndrome (culture-neg) vs sepsis/septic shock (culture-pos)Within-age outcome groups (improved vs no-improve vs non-survivors)Healthy donorsPost-CPB infection-negative systemic inflammation (non-infectious systemic inflammation)
Sepsis markerInterleukin-27Haptoglobin, thrombospondin 1, SAA1/2Soluble CD25, SAA1, leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
Response timeRises within 4-6 hoursRises within 2-4 hoursRises within 4-6 hoursRises within 2-4 hours
Clinical significanceEarly diagnosis of sepsis; monitoring post-surgery recoveryEarly diagnosis of sepsis; optimizing antibiotic treatmentDiagnosis of specific pathogens; prognosis of sepsis severityEarly diagnosis of sepsis; prognosis for severe sepsis
StrengthsHigh specificity for bacterial infection; rapid responseGood specificity for bacterial infections; rapid biomarker riseTargeted multi-marker approach; provides pathogen-specific diagnostic cuesHigh specificity for sepsis; useful for early prognosis
LimitationsLow sensitivity in localized infections (false negatives)False positives in non-bacterial inflammation; expensive testLimited generalizability; potential for false positives in specific casesExpensive; limited accessibility


Write to the Help Desk