©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 113925
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.113925
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.113925
Table 1 Comparison of pharmacological interventions in guidelines
| Guideline | ||||
| Pharmacological agents | NICE (2017) | ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN (2014) | IAP (2018) | Saudi experts (2022) |
| Osmotic laxatives | ||||
| High-dose PEG for dis impaction | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Low-dose PEG for maintenance phase | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Lactulose for maintenance when PEG is not available | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Stimulant laxatives as adjunct therapy with PEG during maintenance. e.g. Bisacodyl, Senna, Sodium Picosulfate | √ | √ | × | √ |
| Enemas for disimpaction when PEG is not available. e.g. Sodium lauryl sulfoacetate, Sodium docusate, Sodium phosphate | √ | √ | √ | × |
| Lubricants. e.g. Mineral oil, Liquid paraffin | × | √ | × | × |
| Novel agents | ||||
| Prucalopride | × | × | × | × |
| Lubiprostone | × | × | × | × |
| Linaclotide | × | × | × | × |
- Citation: Rajindrajith S, Hathagoda W, Balakrishnan K, Devanarayana NM. Pharmacological management of childhood constipation: Bridging today’s gaps with tomorrow’s therapies. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 113925
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/113925.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.113925