©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 111999
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111999
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111999
Table 3 Overview of systematic review and meta-analysis in pediatric sepsis
| Number | Ref. | Biomarkers studies | Number of studies (patients) | Study population | Main results | Conclusion | Limitations |
| 1 | Norman-Bruce et al[29], 2024 | PCT and CRP | 14 studies (n = 7755) | Children aged ≤ 90 days, with fever or history of fever within the preceding 48 hours | For detection of IBI, pAUC was higher for PCT than CRP (0.72 vs 0.28; P = 0.016), but PCT and CRP had similar pAUC values (0.55 vs 0.54; P = 0·92) for detection of SBI | PCT (cutoff of 0·5 ng/mL) had better diagnostic accuracy for IBI than CRP (cutoff of 20 mg/L), and it was similar for SBI | High heterogeneity for SBI studies, lack of a universal SBI definition, and potential bias |
| 2 | Qi et al[30], 2024 | PCT | 5 studies (n = 148) | Children with osteomyelitis | Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 0.58 (95%CI: 0.49-0.68) and 0.92 (0.90-0.93), respectively | PCT had the greatest AUC at 0.80 for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children | Small sample size, variable nature of included studies |
| 3 | Kim et al[31], 2021 | PCT | 18 studies (n = 1462) | Children with bacterial meningitis | pSn, pSp, and DOR of PCT for detecting bacterial meningitis were 087, 0.85, and 35.85, respectively. AUC was 0.921 | Blood PCT has high diagnostic accuracy in detecting bacterial meningitis in children | Variable methodologies and small sample sizes |
| 4 | Boon et al[32], 2021 | 20 urine biomarkers and 4 blood biomarkers (CRP, PCT, WBC, absolute neutrophil count) | 54 studies (n = 117531. UTI, 628-pyelonephritis, and 6320- bacteraemia) | Children with UTI presenting to ambulatory care | CRP and PCT had low accuracy for cystitis (AUC of 0.75 and 0.71). CRP < 20 mg/L might be useful for ruling out UTI, and PCT ≥ 2 ng/mL for ruling in pyelonephritis | CRP and PCT have low accuracy for cystitis, but can be used for pyelonephritis | Heterogeneous patient selection criteria |
| 5 | Shaikh et al[33], 2020 | PCT, CRP, and ESR | 25 studies (PCT, n = 1000; CRP, n = 189; ESR, n = 1910) | Children aged 0-18 years with culture-confirmed UTI | For cut-off values of 0.5 ng/mL for PCT, 20 mg/L for CRP, and 30 mm/hour for ESR, pSn were 081, 0.93, and 0.83, and pSp were 076, 0.37, and 0.57, respectively | All three tests were sensitive but not very specific for ruling in pyelonephritis | High heterogeneity, limited number of studies per test |
| 6 | Tsou et al[34], 2020 | PCT | 25 studies (n = 2864) | Children with bacterial pneumonia | For a cut-off of 0.5 ng/mL and 2 ng/mL, PCT had a pSn of 0.68 and 0.59, pSp of 0.60 and 0.71, and AUC of 0.68 and 0.71. Elevated PCT did not suggest bacterial pneumonia (odds ratio: 1.36, P = 0.18). | Moderate diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.74); best cut-off around 0.5-2 ng/mL | Variability in cutoffs and definitions. Variable timings of PCT measurement |
| 7 | Cui et al[35], 2019 | PCT | 7 studies (504 confirmed AA and 368 controls) | Children with AA and complicated appendicitis | pSn and pSp of PCT for the diagnosis of AA were 062 and 0.86. DOR was 21.4, and AUC was 0.955. PCT was more accurate in diagnosing complicated appendicitis (pSn of 0.89, pSp of 0.90, DOR of 76.73) | PCT was more accurate for complicated appendicitis (pSn of 0.89, pSp of 0.90) than for AA | Small number of studies; moderate heterogeneity; potential publication bias |
| 8 | Yoon et al[36], 2019 | Presepsin, CRP, PCT | 4 studies (n = 308) | Children aged from 1 month to 18 years with sepsis | pSn and AUC of presepsin (0.94 and 0.925) were higher than that of CRP (0.51 and 0.715) and PCT (0.76 and 0.820), whereas pSp of presepsin (0.71) was lower than that of CRP (0.81) and PCT (0.76). | Presepsin has higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy, but lower specificity, in detecting sepsis in children | Small sample size, differences in the reference standards |
| 9 | Arif and Phillips[28], 2019 | 30 different biomarkers. The most common were PCT, CRP, IL-6, and IL-8 | 41 studies (n = 4842) | Febrile neutropenia in children with cancer | The pSn and pSp for different biomarkers to detect any adverse outcome: CRP pSn of 40%, pSp of 65%; PCT pSn of 60%, pSp of 75%; IL-6 pSn of 65%, pSp of 70%; and IL-8 pSn of 70%, pSp of 60% | PCT > 0.5 ng/mL best predicted bacteraemia and severe sepsis: Sensitivity of 0.67, and specificity of 0.73 | Inconsistencies in methodology and reporting of outcomes |
| 10 | Trippella et al[37], 2017 | PCT | 12 studies (n = 7260) | Children with fever without an apparent source | For IBI, sensitivity was 0.82 and 0.61, and specificity was 0.86 and 0.94 at PCT levels of 0.5 ng/mL and 2 ng/mL, respectively. For SBI, PCT had lower sensitivity (0.55 and 0.30) and specificity (0.85 and 0.95) | High diagnostic accuracy for IBI (AUC > 0.9) but poor for SBI, especially at higher PCT cutoffs | Inconsistent definitions, variable cut-offs, and heterogeneity in study populations |
- Citation: Agrawal A, Janjua D, Jadon G. Role of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: What evidence says? World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 111999
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/111999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111999