BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 111501
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111501
Table 7 Summary of gastroesophageal reflux findings in cesarean section-born infants
Ref.
Population
Key findings
C-section association
Modifiable factors
Risk of bias
Dahlen et al[22], 2018869188 infants1.1% diagnosed with GER/GERD; higher in C-section birthsAOR: 1.13 (P < 0.001)Maternal psychiatric illness, prematurity, NICU stayLow (large national dataset, adjusted for multiple confounders)
Pantazi et al[13], 2025134 infantsReduced Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in GER infants; ↑ E. coliGER strongly linked with C-section and dysbiosisArtificial feeding, C-section, antibiotic useModerate (small cohort, microbial focus, controlled analysis)
Ziętek et al[14], 202482-term infantsHigher regurgitation in C-section group (P = 0.0434)Significant increase in GER symptomsFormula feeding, antibiotic useHigh (small sample size, limited adjustment)
Salvatore et al[11], 2019934 infants40% had regurgitation in year one; C-section increased FGID riskAssociated with dyschezia and diarrheaExclusive formula, prolonged hospital staysLow (well-designed, prospective, controlled)
Bi et al[12], 2023988 preterm infants41.6% had GER; C-section among strongest risk factorsYes (χ2 = 33.13, P < 0.001)Lack of breastfeeding, antibiotic/probiotic useModerate (preterm focus, retrospective, good confounder control)
Guo et al[23], 2002496 neonates (C-section only)GER/aspiration prevented with manual interventionNone reportedEarly postnatal interventionHigh (no comparison group, limited external validity)


Write to the Help Desk