BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 111501
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111501
Table 1 Population, intervention, comparison, outcome, inclusion, and exclusion criteria
PICO element
Description
Research questionWhat are the short- and long-term gastrointestinal effects in infants born via C-section compared to those born via vaginal delivery?
Population (P)Infants born via C-section (elective or emergency), from term or preterm gestations, across various geographic and ethnic backgrounds
Intervention (I)Birth by C-section (elective or emergency)
Comparison (C)Infants born via vaginal delivery (with or without labor)
Outcome (O)Short- and long-term gastrointestinal outcomes, including gut dysbiosis, functional gastrointestinal disorders, infantile colic, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux, inflammatory bowel disease, food allergies (including cow’s milk protein allergy), and coeliac disease
Study designSystematic review of observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional), randomized controlled trials, and relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses
OtherInclusion: Human studies, studies reporting delivery mode and gastrointestinal outcomes, studies with clearly defined outcome measures, and English language. Exclusion: Case reports, animal studies, conference abstracts without full data, studies not distinguishing C-section from vaginal delivery or lacking gastrointestinal outcomes


Write to the Help Desk