©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 111501
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111501
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111501
Table 1 Population, intervention, comparison, outcome, inclusion, and exclusion criteria
| PICO element | Description |
| Research question | What are the short- and long-term gastrointestinal effects in infants born via C-section compared to those born via vaginal delivery? |
| Population (P) | Infants born via C-section (elective or emergency), from term or preterm gestations, across various geographic and ethnic backgrounds |
| Intervention (I) | Birth by C-section (elective or emergency) |
| Comparison (C) | Infants born via vaginal delivery (with or without labor) |
| Outcome (O) | Short- and long-term gastrointestinal outcomes, including gut dysbiosis, functional gastrointestinal disorders, infantile colic, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux, inflammatory bowel disease, food allergies (including cow’s milk protein allergy), and coeliac disease |
| Study design | Systematic review of observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional), randomized controlled trials, and relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses |
| Other | Inclusion: Human studies, studies reporting delivery mode and gastrointestinal outcomes, studies with clearly defined outcome measures, and English language. Exclusion: Case reports, animal studies, conference abstracts without full data, studies not distinguishing C-section from vaginal delivery or lacking gastrointestinal outcomes |
- Citation: Al-Beltagi M, Alzayani S, Saeed NK, Bediwy AS, Prabu Kumar A, Bediwy HA, Elbeltagi R. Gastrointestinal consequences of cesarean section birth: A systematic review of short- and long-term effects in infancy and beyond. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 111501
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/111501.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111501