BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 111030
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.111030
Table 1 Summary of quality assessment outcomes for included studies
Study type
Assessment tool
Number of studies
Quality scores/ratings
Key observations
Systematic reviewsPRISMA 202015Mean score: 22/27 (range: 20-25)Most adhered to PRISMA. Minor issues included unreported funding or protocols
Observational studiesNewcastle-Ottawa Scale30Mean score: 7.2/9 (range: 6-8)Limitations included incomplete confounder adjustment and follow-up losses
Randomized controlled trialsCochrane risk of bias 225Low risk: 15, some concerns: 8, high risk: 2High-risk studies had issues with randomization or missing data. Most had adequate blinding


Write to the Help Desk