©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 109864
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864
Table 4 Multiregression analysis of various parameters to predict the final outcome
| Unstandardized B | t | Sig | |
| Constant | 1.609 | 2.775 | 0.009 |
| Intervention group | -0.790 | -0.509 | 0.614 |
| Underlying comorbidity | -0.207 | -1.375 | 0.180 |
| Diastolic shock index | -0.065 | -1.636 | 0.112 |
| Ventilatory requirement | 0.082 | 0.813 | 0.423 |
| Compensated vs hypotensive shock | -0.150 | -0.981 | 0.335 |
| Signs of fluid overload | -0.130 | -0.840 | 0.408 |
| Maximum VIS score | 0.003 | 2.074 | 0.047 |
| pSOFA-L score | 0.047 | 2.349 | 0.026 |
- Citation: Keshri S, Goel AK, Garg AK, Anand V, Rathia SK, Yusuf S. Early inotropic support without fluid bolus vs standard resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: A randomized controlled trial. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 109864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/109864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864