©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 109864
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864
Table 3 Organisms isolated
| Organism | Number of patients |
| Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus | 6 |
| Scrub typhus | 5 |
| Escherichia coli | 5 |
| Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus | 2 |
| Coagulase-negative Staphylococci | 2 |
| Plasmodium falciparum | 1 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 1 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 1 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 1 |
| Morganella morganii | 1 |
| Candida albicans | 1 |
| Total | 26 |
- Citation: Keshri S, Goel AK, Garg AK, Anand V, Rathia SK, Yusuf S. Early inotropic support without fluid bolus vs standard resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: A randomized controlled trial. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 109864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/109864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864