©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2024; 13(2): 93341
Published online Jun 9, 2024. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v13.i2.93341
Published online Jun 9, 2024. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v13.i2.93341
Table 2 The different methods for measuring fecal calprotectin, including their descriptions and key characteristics
| Method | Description |
| ELISA | The most common method for fecal calprotectin measurement |
| Detection achieved through enzyme-linked secondary antibodies to quantify calprotectin in stool samples | |
| Provides quantitative results using colorimetric or fluorescent detection techniques | |
| Widely available and standardized | |
| High sensitivity and specificity | |
| Relatively expensive | |
| Requires laboratory equipment and trained personnel | |
| Turbidimetric immunoassay | Measures turbidity produced when antibodies react with calprotectin in the stool sample |
| Simple and automated, suitable for high-throughput analysis | |
| Fluorescence enzyme immunoassay | Similar to ELISA but uses fluorescent markers to detect calprotectin-antibody complexes in the stool sample |
| High sensitivity and specificity comparable to ELISA | |
| Faster than traditional ELISA | |
| Suitable for point-of-care testing | |
| Less widely available than ELISA | |
| Requires specialized equipment and trained personnel | |
| Lateral flow immunoassay | Rapid and user-friendly method where stool migrates along a membrane containing immobilized antibodies specific to calprotectin |
| Provides quick visual results | |
| Suitable for point-of-care settings or resource-limited environments | |
| Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Utilizes chemiluminescent labels to detect calprotectin-antibody complexes in the stool sample. |
| Often used in automated laboratory platforms for high sensitivity and a wide dynamic range of detection | |
| Immunochromatographic tests | Similar to pregnancy tests, uses colored lines to indicate calprotectin levels |
| Easy to use, requires minimal training | |
| Portable and potentially suitable for home use | |
| Less sensitive and specific than ELISA | |
| Requires visual interpretation, susceptible to user error | |
| Mass spectrometry | A highly accurate and sensitive method for fecal calprotectin measurement |
| Considered the gold standard for research but not widely used in clinical practice | |
| Very expensive, complex technique, not readily available | |
| Quantum dot-based assay | Utilizes quantum dots, nanocrystals that emit fluorescent signals, for measuring fecal calprotectin |
| Offers enhanced sensitivity and multiplexing capabilities | |
| Quantitative polymerase chain reaction | Measures calprotectin mRNA in the stool sample, correlating with fecal calprotectin levels |
| Provides high sensitivity and specificity, suitable for research purposes | |
| Provides quantitative results | |
| Point-of-care tests | Rapid tests performed at the clinic or even at home |
| Faster results (minutes to hours) | |
| Convenient for patients and healthcare providers | |
| Lower sensitivity and specificity compared to ELISA | |
| Limited availability and higher cost per test |
- Citation: Al-Beltagi M, Saeed NK, Bediwy AS, Elbeltagi R. Fecal calprotectin in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases: Pros and cons. World J Clin Pediatr 2024; 13(2): 93341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v13/i2/93341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v13.i2.93341