Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Respirol. Mar 28, 2016; 6(1): 1-13
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v6.i1.1
Table 1 Index trials of lung cancer screening
Ref.ParticipantsExclusion criteriaDesignResults
Aberle et al[5]53454 participantsPrevious lung cancer diagnosisRandomized Control TrialRate of positive screening was 24.2% in LDCT and 6.9% with CXR group
Age 55 to 74
At least 30 pack-year smoking historyCT scan within previous 18 moParticipants randomized to three annual screenings with LDCT (26722) vs single view PA CXR (26732)The majority of positive screening results were false positives, 96.4% in the LDCT group and 94.5% in the CXR group
Former smokers must have quit within previous 15 yrLung cancer mortality decreased by 20% (P = 0.004) and all cause mortality decreased by 6.7% in LDCT group (P = 0.02)
van Iersel et al[14]15822 participantsHemoptysis or unexplained weight loss of 15 lbs or more in last yearRandomized Control TrialOngoing - 10 yr follow up planned
Age 50-74Current or past diagnosis of renal cancer, melanoma or breast cancer
Determined to be high risk based on answers to heath questionnaireLung cancer diagnosis within last 5 yr or current treatmentParticipants randomized to either LDCT screening (7915) or no screening (7907)
Good overall health (able to climb 2 flights of stairs, weight less than 140 kg)CT scan within past year
Infante et al[16]2472 participantsHistory of previous malignancy treated within 10 yr (exceptions: Early laryngeal cancer and nonmelanoma skin cancer with a 5-yr disease-free interval)Randomized Control TrialOngoing. 3 yr results: Lung cancer detected in 4.7% of patients in LDCT group and 2.8% in controls (P = 0.016)
Males aged 60-74
20 pack-year smoking historyComorbid conditions with life expectancy less than 5 yrRandomized to 5 yr of annual screening with LDCT (1276) or clinical follow up (1196)There was a 1.6% lung cancer mortality in the LDCT group and 1.7% in the control group (P = 0.84). No difference in all cause mortality (P = 0.83) to this point in the study
Saghir et al[22]4104 participantsPrevious cancer diagnosis and treatmentRandomized control trialThere was a higher rate of invasive procedures performed in the LDCT group compared with controls (P < 0.0001)
Age 50-70Ongoing. 5 yr results:
At least 20 pack-year smoking historyComorbid illness that would shorten life expectancy to < 10 yrParticipants randomized to five annual LDCT screenings (2052) or no screening (2052)Lung cancer was diagnosed in 69 patients in the LDCT group, compared with 24 in the control group (P < 0.001)
Former smokers who quit after age 50 and quit less than 10 yr priorCT scan within previous yearStage I-IIB lung cancer was diagnosed more frequently in the LDCT group (P = 0.002), however there was no difference in frequency of Stage IIIA-IV lung cancer (P = 0.509)
FEV1 of at least 30% predicted valueThere was no difference in mortality from lung cancer (P = 0.428) or overall mortality (P = 0.059) to this point of follow up
Good overall health (able to climb 2 flights of stairs, weight less than 130 kg)
Pastorino et al[23]4099 participantsHistory of cancer within the previous 5 yrRandomized Control TrialThe cumulative 5-yr lung cancer incidence rate was 0.0031% in the control group, 0.0046% in the biennial, and 0.0062% in the annual LDCT group (P = 0.036)
Age 49 or older
At least 20 pack-year smoking history - current smoker or had quit within 10 yrRandomized participants to annual LDCT screening (1190), biennial LDCT screening (1186), or observation alone (1723)Rates of mortality from lung cancer were 0.0011% in the control group, 0.0011% in the biennial group, and 0.0022% in the annual group (P = 0.21)
There was also no difference in all cause mortality between the three groups (P = 0.13)