Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Feb 10, 2017; 6(1): 1-7
Published online Feb 10, 2017. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v6.i1.1
Table 3 Birth outcomes and experiences of fathers in the setting of teenage pregnancy
Birth outcomesTeenage (n = 50)Control (n = 50)P-value
Gestational age of baby
Preterm (< 37 wk)6 (12%)4 (8%)0.15
Term (37-41 wk)42 (84%)41 (82%)
Post term (> 41 wk)2 (4%)5 (10%)
Induction of labour
Yes9 (18%)14 (28%)0.02
No40 (80%)31 (62%)
N/A (had elective CS)1 (2%)5 (10%)
Newborn gender
Male25 (50%)27 (54%)
Female25 (50%)23 (46%)0.57
Birth weight below 10% adjusted for gestational age
Yes8 (16%)4 (8%)0.037
No42 (84%)46 (92%)
Delivery mode
Spontaneous vaginal birth39 (78%)26 (52%)0.0007
Assisted vaginal birth6 (12%)8 (16%)
Elective Caesarean birth1 (2%)5 (10%)
Non-elective Caesarean birth4 (8%)11 (22%)
Required admission to a neonatal nursery
Yes10 (20%)5 (10%)0.018
No40 (80%)45 (90%)
Father attended the birth
Yes49 (98%)50 (100%)0.91
No1 (2%)0 (0%)
Father felt prepared for the birth
Yes6 (12%)42 (84%)< 0.0001
Neutral37 (74%)2 (4%)
No7 (14%)4 (8%)
Father found midwifery staff to be helpful
Yes40 (80%)41 (82%)0.60
Neutral8 (16%)6 (12%)
No2 (4%)3 (6%)
Father found medical staff to be helpful
Yes38 (76%)41 (82%)0.004
Neutral10 (20%)4 (8%)
No2 (4%)5 (10%)
Father felt consulted by staff during birth
Yes5 (10%)40 (80%)< 0.0001
Neutral22 (44%)6 (12%)
No23 (46%)4 (8%)