Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
Figure 1 Finite element models tested in this study used either an inline or transarticular orientation.
For models that included a superior implant, the length was varied such that the implant ended above the S1 foramen (mid-ala) or the midline of the sacrum (mid-sacrum).
- Citation: Lindsey DP, Kiapour A, Yerby SA, Goel VK. Sacroiliac joint stability: Finite element analysis of implant number, orientation, and superior implant length. World J Orthop 2018; 9(3): 14-23
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i3/14.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14