Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2018; 9(3): 14-23
Published online Mar 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14
Table 2 Reduction in sacroiliac joint range of motion (°) between transarticular and inline orientation groups
OrientationImplants (positions)Superior implant ending pointReduction in SI joint ROM (°) (%)
Flexion-extensionLateral bendingAxial rotation
Transarticular vs inline3 (S, M, I)Mid-ala0.11° (16%)0.04° (9%)0.07° (17%)
Mid-sacrum0.11° (17%)0.03° (7%)0.07° (18%)
2 (S, -, I)Mid-ala0.13° (16%)0.05° (11%)0.08° (18%)
Mid-sacrum0.11° (16%)0.04° (9%)0.08° (20%)
2 (S, M, -)Mid-ala0.16° (16%)0.05° (10%)0.09° (18%)
Mid-sacrum0.12° (16%)0.04° (9%)0.08° (19%)
2 (-, M, I)-10.15° (16%)0.06° (11%)0.09° (16%)
1 (-, M, -)-10.21° (16%)0.05° (8%)0.03° (4%)
1 (-, -, I)-10.20° (16%)0.07° (10%)0.06° (8%)
Median (°) (Range)0.13° (0.11-0.21)0.05° (0.03-0.07)0.08° (0.03-0.09)
Median (%) (Range)16% (16-17)9% (7-11)18% (4-20)